Conspiracy Theory Unofficial Narrative Fake Manufactured Terrorism The story of the London Bombings 7 July 2005 7/7 Jean Charles de Menezes Ian Blair Tony Blair

I’m not sure about this and I’d like some feedback.

THIS ARTICLE IS TO BE REPEATEDLY UPDATED AND AMENDED. While I have a lot, I don’t have the whole story so I would appreciate help with the uncertain parts. Thanks.

[23/11/13 One of the problems I encounter is that people helping don’t realise what I’ve already got. For example, I got the ’empty’ lead years ago when I was ignoring it as it was repeatedly raised.]

It’s a good day (to start).

Context, Terrorism, 2005 election, Inquiries Act, Bristol Indymedia, G8 & Privy Council ruling, Dust explosions, London Bombings, Cobra meeting for G8 not 7/7, Jerusalem Post articles, Ian Blair, murder of Jean Charles de Menezes


Terrorism is a godsend for governments. It provides a wonderful excuse for dodgy newly-developed airplanes falling out of the sky when their doors open at 30 thousand feet and it provides a wonderful excuse for dust explosions on the London Underground. It provides a ready excuse for shitty old Jeeps with documented faults crashing off motorways and bursting into flames. It provides for massive made for television sacrificial rituals to start already planned wars.

7/1/14 The magick is working, I’m making fine progress – it’s almost as if it was hidden in plain sight all along. It was.

Just a tiny piece today. On 7/7/2005 – the day of explosions on the London underground and the strange bombing of a double-decker bus an hour later – the boss of the Metropolitan police Ian Blair said “The most important message though however is just that it, while it is a confused situation it must be a confused situation in multiple sites like this, a co-ordinated effort is slowly bringing order out of the chaos.”

There are two issues about this statement. Firstly try finding it using a search engine. It’s almost as if I made it up. I didn’t of course but the web has been scrubbed. That takes the sort of power that only governments have.

Secondly, what is meant by the phrase ‘order out of (the) chaos’ which is explained very well here

The need to deter democracy by alienating public opinion from public policy, is one that has been long understood. Back in 1921, the highly influential political columnist and media analyst Walter Lippmann, wrote the book “Public Opinion”,where he discussed the need for the “manufacture of consent”; given the inherent pitfalls and barriers to an accurate and effective public opinion (democracy, essentially), it is necessary that this opinion is crafted by a higher sphere of influence. This was understood very well by Edward Bernays, who was the founder of Public Relations (he indeed coined the term), and the formulator of not just corporate, but also political PR. He sketches out his views on this in his 1928 work, “Propaganda where he states that “The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society”, suggesting like Lippmann, that democracy is a “chaos” that needs regulation from above. This “above” is a small section of elites: “We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.” These are the people who will ensure that the masses are sedated, and free to run their daily lives, without participating in the broader picture of public policy, given the dangers that this would pose to the influence of said elites, and thus the smooth functioning of society. To paraphrase Bernays, a leader must serve by leading, not lead by serving.   Read more:

As explained in the quoted section above, bringing order out of chaos can be understood to be ‘manufacturing of consent’,  “the conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses …”

Well-educated people – better educated than myself – politicians and the like, people who … for whatever reason … have come to realise the meaning of the term would, er … recognise the term and know what it means. That there was a manipulation of events to manufacture consent going on.

8/1/14 Just for fun since we shouldn’t take ourselves too seriously, … he know’s I’m right. I’ve seen the light, it’s been revealed to Me, etc.



Continue ReadingConspiracy Theory Unofficial Narrative Fake Manufactured Terrorism The story of the London Bombings 7 July 2005 7/7 Jean Charles de Menezes Ian Blair Tony Blair

Previous blog: Danger of dust explosions on the London Underground

Thursday, December 18, 2008 – Danger of dust explosions on the London Underground

This blog was mysteriously deleted in early December 2005. [edit: 2006] Here is a posting from the deleted previous content. [19/8/11 It was actually mysteriously deleted in early December 2008]

� January 10, 2006 – Danger of dust explosions on the London Underground

Danger of dust explosions on the London Underground
This article argues that the danger of dust explosions from combustible tunnel dust on the London underground has not been properly recognised and addressed. It suggests that the RMT union urgently investigates the dangers of dust explosions on the tube so that it is able to ensure the safety of its members and the public.

What is a dust explosion?

In the last 20 years industrial dust explosions have accounted for several hundred deaths and hundreds of millions of dollars of insurance money and yet they are one of the least recognised of industrial fire hazards. They can occur within any process where a combustible dust is produced, and can be triggered by any energy source, including static sparks, friction and incandecent material.

There are a few basic rules to observe to see whether a dust is capable of causing a dust explosion:

  • The dust must be combustible.
  • The dust must be capable of becoming airborne.
  • The dust must have a size distribution capable of flame propagation.
  • The dust concentration must be within the explosible range.
  • An ignition source must be present.
  • The atmosphere must contain sufficient oxygen to support and sustain combustion.

London Underground does not recognise tunnel dust as a potential fire and explosive hazard.

Minutes: The Tube Future

Priorities Investigative Committee

18 December 2001

Mike Strzelecki, LUL: It’s dust, it’s caked on dust, it’s a mixture of iron from the action of the rail on the wheel and vice versa, it’s human dust in terms of skin and hair particles which we all shed routinely, and it’s quartz from the brake locks on trains. Now, a lot of research has been done into this over the years, including very recently, indeed we had an Institute examine all the research that’s been done to determine whether this stuff is dangerous to people’s health or not, and the answer is that there is no evidence that it is, and the most sort of compelling evidence that it isn’t, is that the staff who work on the underground who are obviously are in the underground environment much longer than customers, there is no evidence of any medical problems occurring from long hours and many years of exposure, working in the underground.

Eric Ollerenshaw: Is there a fire risk?

Mike Strzelecki, LUL: No, it doesn’t burn.

Having reviewed available evidence – concentrating particularly on incidents in 2003 – this article calls for an urgent investigation into the fire and explosive dangers of tunnel dust on the London Underground.

Is tube tunnel dust dangerous?

London Underground have conducted inquiries into the possible dangers of breathing tunnel dust. These inquiries provide an insight into the composition of tunnel dust. Care should be taken in evaluating the findings since the studies concentrate on suspended dust in stations and drivers’ cabs. It is likely that the dust actually inside the tunnels is different since it is a different environment. There is little movement of air, tube trains travel along sections between platforms and dust probably accumulates in the deeper parts of tunnels. Tunnel dust may have a higher iron content from wear of the rails and wheels and less organic content from passangers clothes, etc.

Studies into London tube tunnel-dust reveal that it is composed of iron, silica and organic products. Different studies have arrived at different ratios of these constitiuents with London Underground finding a roughly 50% iron content and a study conducted by IOM finding a 90% iron content.

It is generally accepted that dust must be smaller than 0.1mm in diamater to pose an explosive hazard, with smaller particles being more explosive. The dust inhalation studies on the London tube have been concerned with much smaller particles than this.

[PM10s are particles with a diamater less than 10 micrometres, PM2.5 have a diamater less that 2.5 micrometre. 1 micrometre = 1 millionth of a metre, 1×10-9m]

Institute of Occupationa Medicine report ‘Study of tunnel dust in the London Underground’

Composition of tunnel dust: Samples from station platforms showed that almost all (typically, about 90%) of the dust in the PM 2.5 samples was analysed as iron. There were trace amounts of chromium (0.1 ? 0.2%), manganese (0.6 ? 1%) and copper (0.1 ? 1.5%). No zinc was detected on any of the samples (<0.1%). Quartz, analysed in respirable dust, accounted for only 1-2%; these measurements were approximate, being close to the analytical detection limit.

The distributions from the three stations are remarkably similar, with the data from Hampstead being slightly finer. The median diameter for the dust from Oxford Circus and Holland Park is 0.4µm and for Hampstead 0.35µm. In each case about 80% of the particles have a diameter less than 1µm. Again, note that this underestimates the aerodynamic diameter of the denser particles.

[µm is micrometre – one millionth of a metre (1×10-6 m), equivalent to one thousandth of a millimetre.]

Does it burn? is the big question. If it burns, then it is explosive when suspended or thrown into the air.

Materials that can cause dust explosions:

  • Natural Organic materials (grain, linen, sugar, etc)
  • Synthetic Organic Materials (plastics, organic pigments, pesticides, etc)
  • Coal and Peat
  • Metals (aluminium, zinc, iron, etc)

Iron burns, organic materials burn.

Tunnel dust silica crystals have a coating of iron on their surface, which makes them less likely to cause fibrotic lung disease.

Since the silica is coated with iron, it will burn.

Have there been dust explosions on the tube?

Eyewitness accounts certainly suggest that there have been many dust explosions on the tube. Witnesses often speak of smoke, dust and fires. There have been many trackside fires. If not dust, then what’s burning? It’s almost as if there’s a conspiracy to deny this real danger to tube users.

25 January 2003 Chancery Lane,,882674,00.html

Passengers involved in a horrific rail crash on London Underground told last night how they escaped death thanks to a miraculous chain of events after a Tube train lost a wheel and hit the tunnel wall.

Yesterday’s crash, which left 30 people injured and prompted fresh questions about under-investment in rail safety, happened shortly after 2pm as the train was travelling from St Paul’s to Chancery Lane.

Witnesses said sparks flew from beneath the train, which was carrying 800 people, before the three rear carriages left the tracks, bouncing from wall to wall and sending passengers flying from their seats. Last night one man was being treated for a suspected broken leg after being smashed into the opposite side of the train.

Amid scenes of panic as the carriages were plunged into darkness and smoke billowed through smashed windows and doors, some passengers helped others out along the track. ‘I was absolutely panicking,’ said Claire Ellis. ‘I was thinking: this is it, this is the day it happens.’

The hospital said many passengers had suffered smoke inhalation.

Economics student Humaiun Kobir, 25, was on the last carriage. ‘The train was being thrown from side to side, hitting both walls of the tunnel. All the lights went out and thick black smoke was pouring in. I could hear the driver over the radio shouting “Mayday, mayday” then the train stopped.

‘He asked all the passengers to get to the front as quickly as possible. My first thought was that it was some kind of terrorist attack. We were all terrified that another train was going to smash into the back of us. But we knew there was a fire and no one wanted to run into that.’

The driver was treated for smoke inhalation and was breathalysed, but the results were negative.

Tube crash: Eyewitness accounts

“When the train arrived at the station I think it came off the track and hit the tunnel.

There was some kind of fire.

Most people’s faces went black and they couldn’t breathe properly.

There was smoke inside the carriage.

We were lucky to survive.

Most of the people in my carriage were crying and praying for survival.

In my carriage there were a lot of kids and they were crying.

The train stopped suddenly and bumped six times before it stopped so people were really scared and didn’t know what was happening.

The driver himself couldn’t even breathe himself. His face was all black.”

“There was an immense vibration and banging as the train shuddered to a halt.

The driver said, ‘Mayday! Mayday!’, then, ‘Help! Help!’ there was a fire at the back of the train, and told everyone to leave as fast as possible.

There were many people panicking in my carriage, which was very full.

The carriage began to fill up with smoke, as did the platform.

And we could see those on the platform running and screaming as we tried desperately to open the doors of the carriage.

I truly thought the sight of the platform filling with smoke might be the last thing I saw.”

19 June 2003

More than 90 passengers had to be evacuated from a Tube train and walked to safety through the tunnel following a track fire, London Underground (LU) said.

Fire crews were called to a small track-side fire on the Bakerloo Line at Embankment at about 1340 BST, a LU spokeswoman said.

During the incident, one of the trains stalled in the tunnel and 94 passengers were stranded on board for 40 minutes before being walked down to Waterloo station.

The incident was one of three to affect rail and tube networks in London during the day.

The Rail Maritime and Transport (RMT) union also claimed a “potentially serious” incident was averted on 11 October when a driver decided to evacuate a train and take it out of service because of a defect.

It said the train had a seized axle which could have resulted in a derailment if it had continued, but LU accused the RMT of exaggerating the incident.

Eyewitness Harry Anscombe, 22, arrived at the station at 1015 BST as emergency services pulled up outside. “There were lots of blackened faces and there was one man with bandages on his face and blood streaming down,” he said.

Mr Anscombe asked one of the passengers what had happened, but the man said he did not know because it was “so black down there”. The passenger said the derailment had caused a huge amount of dust to fly up, making it difficult to see.

Why we need an inquiry

This article raises the issue of the unacknowledged danger of dust explosions on the London tube. There is no indication that London Underground has investigated the danger of dust explosions. On the contrary, evidence is presented that suggests that London Underground has been complacent and negligent in its approach to public safety. The article suggests – through witness accounts – that dust explosions have played a role in tube incidents.

Should it be accepted that dust poses an explosive hazard on the London tube, then safety procedures must change. Maintence needs to be performed flawlessly so that nothing disturbs the dust and that there are no sources of heat to ignite it. Drivers and other staff need to be trained properly so that they can better ensure their own and the public’s safety. Drivers need to know that they should not drive through visible clouds of dust.

Ten minutes later, a driver on a following train reported Bethnal Green and Liverpool Street stations were “really dusty and murky”. The controller reports “there might be a problem with the train in front” and the driver replied “it ain’t half kicking up a lot of dust”. It is suggested that the RMT urgently investigates the dangers of dust explosions on the London tube.

� January 11, 2006 – Fire alert on London tube 11/1/2006

Posted by dizzy

REUTERS reports smoke and fire engines attending 2 tube stations.

Is it fair to assume that smoke is coming from a tunnel?No smoke without fire eh?

LONDON (Reuters) – No one was hurt in an alert that brought fire engines to two London Underground stations on Wednesday, police said.

A spokewoman for London Transport police said firefighters had checked reports of smoke coming from the Bakerloo line, but the incident was not threatening. Fire engines were sent to Oxford Circus and Piccadilly Circus.

� May 3, 2006 – Ignition

Posted by parallax

BBC NEWS – Track power surge releases flare

Last Updated: Saturday, 1 October 2005, 16:08 GMT 17:08 UKTrain passengers fled a platform after a power surge sent a flare 10 foot into the air from the track.

An eye witness described people screaming as the fireball moved along the track at London Bridge station on Saturday afternoon.

Electrician Peter Difolco, 44, was returning from a shopping trip when he said there was a large flash.

“It was like a Roman candle firework, there was lots of smoke and people were screaming and running out the station.”

‘Station evacuated’

Mr Difolco, who was with his wife, said he had an idea it was something electrical.

“I had guessed it was something electrical but there were a lot of frightened people.

“There was a small explosion like a firecracker. It went up quite high and started working its way down the track, it went about 120 foot and it lasted for about a minute.

“There were lots of police sirens and then the station was evacuated and staff were comforting people.”

British Transport Police confirmed there was an incident involving a power line at the station at about 1330 BST.

The station closed for about 30 minutes.

� September 11, 2006 – Problems with explosives

Posted by dizzy

There seem to be problems with the nature and the location of the explosives. If they were dust cloud explosions, then they would be over a wide area and there would be no explosives to identify.

Continue ReadingPrevious blog: Danger of dust explosions on the London Underground

Previous blog: Blair’s government and Metropolitan Police policy dictated by the Jerusalem Post

An article from my previous ‘On a quiet day, I can hear her breathing’ blog which ceased on 31 May 2011. The previous blog was mysteriously deleted in early April 2008.

Thursday, December 18, 2008 – Blair’s government and Metropolitan Police policy dictated by the Jerusalem Post

� April 19, 2006 – Blair’s government and Metropolitan Police policy dictated by the Jerusalem Post

Ian Blair’s letter to the Home Office stating that he is blocking the Independent Police Complaints Commission (incorrectly dated 21 July 2005, correct date 22 July 2005) reveals concern for the tactics and sources used in the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes.”There is much concern about revealing either the tactics that we have and/or the sources of information on which we are operating.”Makes you wonder … doesn’t it? Lets review the situation.On 7 July, 2005 a series of at least three explosions occurred on the London tube network followed by an explosion on a London bus approximately an hour later. 56 people were killed and hundreds injured. I have proposed that the tube explosions – but not the bus bombing – were the result of incompetence, negligence or ignorancesince there was an anti-terrorism exercise being carried out at the same time. I have also written about the unacknowledged danger of dust explosions on the London underground. It is worth noting that Peter Power of Visor Consultants that had organised the exercise has stated that the explosions occured at “precisely” where his fictitious explosions were planned and that they had prepared their exercise without external assistance (i.e. without consulting fire safety experts). [dated 21 August 2005]

“On July 22, an innocent Brazilian citizen was gunned down inside a London Underground train during a bungled police operation which followed the second terrorist attack in London. The Metropolitan Police says the shooting was a “tragic mistake”. But behind the public contrition there lies a web of contradictory statements, deviation from routine procedures, and a mist of confusion that has led to serial calls for the resignation of the Met’s head, Sir Ian Blair. And throughout four weeks of calls for clarity and the truth, has been the odour of a police cover-up that has refused to retreat in its intensity.”

Blair’s “evil ideology” speech betrays his deep evil Neo-Conservative roots. I have referred to Halevi’s 7 July 2005 article at the end of this post.  A second articleAnalysis: Israeli experts say UK didn’t dig deep enough in uprooting Islamists was published on 8 July 2005. Both Jerusalem Post articles have strongly influenced Blair’s Neo-Con government and the police response to the 7 July 2005 London explosions.

Halevi says the blasts were simultaneous. The police ‘investigation’ say the blasts were simultaneous.

Halevi discusses attacks in 1998 and 911. Blair discusses the World Trade Centre bombing of 1993.

Halevi demands that the rules of combat are changed. The police shoot to kill.

Halevi discusses civilization. Blair discusses civilization.

Halevi calls for the “complete destruction” of the enemy. The police shoot to kill.

Dig deeper say the Zionists. “Roots are not superficial, but deep” says Blair.

“Measured, surgical steps” say the Zionists. Jean Charles de Menezes, a ‘surgical strike’.

“Sleeper cells” say the Zionists. Police ‘discover’ a sleeper-cell.

The Zionists say “British security had not been caught sleeping, but rather didn’t root out terror cells with enough resolve.” MI5 not at fault, the police shoot to kill, the roots are deep.

“In the past two years, they have arrested several cells. But this attack shows they didn’t go deep enough and this is mainly due to legal and cultural restrictions. Now they will be much freer to go deeper,” Cristal predicted. The roots are deep, Jean Charles de Menezes murdered, Guardian reports that Blair considers that socialists are terrorists, Blair attempts to introduce 90 days detention for terrorist suspects, other ‘anti-terrorism’ laws introduced.

“It’s about preventing the next attack. The big challenge the Brits are facing now is to use this chance to redefine the balance between human rights and measures against terrorism,” he said. Blair tries to redefine the balance between human rights and measures against terrorism.


Continue ReadingPrevious blog: Blair’s government and Metropolitan Police policy dictated by the Jerusalem Post

Previous blog: Richmal Marie Oates-Whiteheadt

An article from my previous ‘On a quiet day, I can hear her breathing’ blog that ceased on 31 May 2011.

Thursday, December 18, 2008 – Richmal Marie Oates-Whitehead

� November 9, 2007 – Richmal Marie Oates-Whitehead

Richmal Marie Oates-Whitehead

The girl’s name Richmal (i)-ch-mal is a variant of Ricarda.

The girl’s name Ricarda (i)-car-daric(a)-rda is of Old German origin, and its meaning is “powerful leader“. Feminine form of Richard.

Richmal Female German Feminine form of Richard: Hard ruler.

The boy’s and girl’s name Marie m(a)-rie is of French origin. Variant of Mary (Latin) “star of the sea“. Earliest English form of the name which was revived in the 19thcentury.

The meaning of the name Marie is Sea Of Bitterness.


The origin of the name Marie is French.


Last name origin & meaning:

English: patronymic from the Middle English personal name Ode (see Ott).
Last name origin & meaning:

English and German: from a Middle English personal name, Ode, in which personal names of several different origins have coalesced: principally Old English Od(d)a, Old Norse Od(d)a and Continental Germanic OdoOtto. The first two are short forms of names with the first element Old English ord, Old Norse odd ‘point of a weapon’. The Continental Germanic names are from a short form of compound names with the first element od- ‘possessions’, ‘riches’. The situation is further confused by the fact that all of these names were Latinized as Odo. Odo was the name of the half-brother of the Conqueror, archbishop of Bayeux, who accompanied the Norman expedition to England and was rewarded with 439 confiscated manors. The German name Odo or Otto was a hereditary name in the Saxon ruling house, as well as being borne by Otto von Wittelsbach, who founded the Bavarian ruling dynasty in the 11th century, and the 12th-century Otto of Bamberg, apostle of Pomerania.

Surname: Whitehead

Recorded in a number of spellings including Whithead, Whitehed, Whithed, and Whitsed, this surname is of English origins. It usually derives from the Olde English pre 7th Century word “hwit” meaning white, plus “heafod”, a head, combined to form a descriptive nickname for someone with white hair. Many early surnames originate from medieval nicknames, and this is one of them. With men generally dying at about age forty, and women even younger, people with white hair were quite rare. Early recordings of the surname include Roger Witheved, who appeared in the Hundred Rolls of Huntingdonshire, dated 1273, and Adam Whytehevde of Hoton, who was a juror on an inquisition before the sheriff of Berwick in 1300. In 1338 Robert Whitede was recorded in the Manorial Records of Sheffield, Yorkshire. Occasionally, the name may derive from “Hwithod”, meaning white hood, and an occupational name for one who made white hoods for use in monasteries. An early example is that of Agnes Wythod recorded in the Hundred Rolls of Oxfordshire, for 1279.

Kether, the white head

The name of this point is I AM, called by the Hebrews Eheieh. The Qabbalists gave many names to this dot. On this subject Christian D. Ginsberg writes, in substance: The dot is called the first crown, because it occupies the highest position. It is called the aged, because it is the first emanation. It is called the primordial or smooth point. It is called the white head, the Long Face–Macroprosophus–and the inscrutable height, because it controls and governs all the other emanations.

Dr. Oates-Whitehead. Do I have to spell it out for you? Do the math.

18/12/08: Surname & Official title.

28/12/12 edit: Try it hyphonated on both it’s sides

Richmal-Marie Oates-Whitehead


Continue ReadingPrevious blog: Richmal Marie Oates-Whiteheadt

Previous Blog: Dr. Who?

An article from my previous ‘On a quiet day, I can hear her breathing’ blog that ceased on 31 May 2011. Links are broken.

Thursday, December 18, 2008 – Dr. Who?

Doctor Who's tardis. Image hosted by http://xs.toDr. Richmal Oates-Whitehead. Apparently Dr. Richmal Oates-Whitehead claimed to be a doctor when she was not qualified. Is she pointing at someone else that claims to be a Doctor but is not qualified?

We’ve already looked at the origin and meaning of the names of the victims. There is a deeper analysis that can be applied to those names and this name.

I tend to consider Richmal Oates-Whitehead’s death as a response to the Halevi document of 7 July 2005 and the dig-deeper article of 8 July 2005, both published in the Jerusalem Post.



I added an addendum to this article yesterday. What’s happened?

It said – possibly not verbatim

Try names hyphonised on both sides

Richmal-Marie Oates-Whitehead


5 mins later: My mistake – it was another post that I edited

Continue ReadingPrevious Blog: Dr. Who?

Previous Blog: Esoteric Knowledge #3 Jean Charles de Menezes

An article from my previous ‘On a quiet day, I can hear her breathing’ blog that ceased on 31 May 2011. Links are broken.

The previous blog was mysteriously deleted in early December 2008.

[7/1/14 Please note that I now have improved powers of exegesis.]

Wednesday, December 17, 2008 – Esoteric Knowledge #3 Jean Charles de Menezes

This blog was mysteriously deleted in early December 2005 [actually 2008]. Here is a posting from the deleted previous content.17/12/08 Please note that since writing this article I have come to understand far more about the revelation of ‘Jean’ and that there are mistakes in this article. For example, I now believe that the sequence of bullets was 137 – that’s one to the shoulder so that he is not killed instantly, three misses and then seven to the back of the head. The revelation of ‘Jean’ tells me that Jean Charles de Menezes was selected for execution. It was state-sponsored murder with the hidden message in his murder being the identity and location of another that the Fascist UK Labour Party government and their butler Ian Blair wanted dead. Ian Blair has repeatedly made deep’s identity known, has repeatedly called for deep’s murder and has repeatedly harassed deep e.g. “Houston, we have a problem.” said by Ian Blair was said by a cuddly astronaut toy in deep’s lounge, followed by a farty noise.Fascist UK Labour Party Home Secretaries – including the current incumbent Jacqui Smith – have repeatedly stated their support for Ian Blair. The Fascists should be held accountable for their actions and should not be governing the country or in public office.In Occult circles there is a tradition to not share Occult wisdom. I have not ever taken any such vows, I have come across this knowledge through my researches into 911, 77, Jean Charles de Menezes, etc. It is anyway not secret but published for everyone to see and apply.

I do not play by your rules. The rules of the game have changed particularly since there have been repeated attempts on my life and this knowledge has been used against me.

I would also say that it appears that Ian Blair has been fantastically indiscreet in his use of this knowledge, apparently in an attempt to save his own sad skin. I followed his first Mark Twain comments to find the reference. I would be extremely surprised if he hadn’t taken and broken vows of secrecy.

18/12/08 I was also mistaken about the approach to gematria. It is worth taking gematria very seriously – considering tarot correspondences of the final letters, etc.

� January 9, 2007 – Esoteric Knowledge #3 Jean Charles de Menezes

There have been a few posts on this blog concerning Gematria. I looked at Tony Blair’s use of the word ‘cow‘, the date of and the eleven bullets that killed Jean Charles de Menezes, the 210 in polonium-210 that allegedly killed Alexander Litvinenko and the ‘missing’ key that enables English words to be translated to Gematria. I had better explain how I’m using it to research events.Gematria started as a study of sacred texts and it is believed by its adherents that it provides an undertanding of the universe. Words or phrases are translated into a number. For a particular number there are many definitions that are equivalent to each other. It is somewhat interprative and subjective.Gematria is employed in my research in a few different ways. With the cow I searched the Gematria Reference for cow and discovered that it is equivalent to to break or send forth lightning, to flash forth; lightning; flash; pr.n. “Thunderbolt”. With Litvinenko’s 210 and Jean Charles de Menezes’ 11, I referred to those values in the reference. I have also been using Agrippa’s key to convert English words and phrases into numbers before referring to the reference.

Does it work? Perhaps it is more appropriate to ask why it shouldn’t work. I am treating Gematria as a way to communicate based on a special body of knowledge. That knowledge will be shared by Freemasons and similar organisations worldwide e.g. secretive North American university societies. Surely some of them are communicating in this way? The real test is have a go, see if we can discern any messages, see if it is useful to wider research. 

“It seems that Gematria constitutes the clavis magna – the great key – to the secrets of the Freemasons. Therefore, turning this key promises to be an eye-opener for all of us troglodytes grovelling hopelessly in ‘profane’ darkness.”


Selecting phrases/numbers can be a lottery. Chose the wrong phrases or numbers to start with and the results will be worthless, wrong and misleading. Any word or phrase will produce some result. There needs to be a message to start with. Gematria is approached – hopefully – as a Freemason would use it to convey messages. A UK or US mason is not going to learn the strict complex rules of Gematria to any great depths e.g. it is not necessary to learn the Hebrew or Greek alphabet since we are dealing with English. As I have persevered, I have started to remember certain key numbers and their meanings. For example eleven is to do with slaughter and sacrifice and 1 directs to 111 in the Cabbalistic (QBL) tradition which we – or rather Freemasons – are pursuing. References to animals are often references to animals as sacrifices. Hadad was a god of rain and thunder and lightening.Individuals probably use their own distinctive styles in communicating through Gematria so that it may be more important to appreciate the style rather than any strict rules. I’ve found that it’s worth following redirections e.g.890 redirects to  170 and 330  and 14 reads (see also 13). I also suspect that it’s a good to hit primes, especially large ones. 

Here’s the ‘missing’ key to convert English words and phrases to Gematria. This is Agrippa’s keyIt’s useful to write a simple program to convert words and phrases into their respective numbers – it saves a lot of time and effort.

The Missing Key

The Missing Key
The Missing Key

(* ‘Hi’ is an obsolete letter)

source CABALA – Missing Key to the Secrets of FreemasonryOn 7 July, 2005 – the day of the London explosions – Ian Blair, Commissioner of the London Metropolitan Police said “The most important message though however is just that it, while it is a confused situation it must be a confused situation in multiple sites like this, a co-ordinated effort is slowly bringing order out of the chaos(890).” Many sites appear to have misquoted Blair as saying “order out of chaos”(777) which is recognised as a classic Freemasonry phrase. It confirms that it is likely that Blair is a Freemason and to warn us that we should be alert to possible ‘covert’ messages using Gematria.We have already seen 210 from Litvinenko’s polonium-210, 227 and 11 from the number of bullets and the date of Jean Chares de Menezes’ death (22/7 2 + 2 + 7 = 11 (227 > 11 > 2) and 317 from the assumed sequence of bullets that killed Jean Charles de Menezes (and also gives 11 > 2).

227 > 11  >  2

227 (49th prime)
pr.n. “Warlike”.  –  Kratos?
pool or pond.  –  relates to water
to pick, pierce, penetrate
to bind fast or hard; to force; to be strong, brave, cruel.
a taught heifer (one used to the yoke). —  A trained cow. Could this relate to Blair’scow?

317 > 11 > 2Special Reconnaissance Regiment

317 (66th prime)
grave mound, tomb.
a sharp or new sword; pr.n. “New Built”.  –  First use of Operation Kratos (shoot-to-kill) by British police?
the dry, dry ground, the dry land.  –  in contrast to the deep ocean?
a place sown, a field.
the west, westward. 

11 (5th prime)
to slaughter.
to cluster
to turn; to wind; to surround; to be strong, mighty.
pr.n. “A Pit”.

festival; feast; festive sacrifice.
good; pleasing.


On 21st July, 2005 there were ‘copy-cat’ attacks similar to those official account of the London explosions of 7 July, 2005. The big difference was that the ‘bombs’ used on 21 July were apparently unable to explode since there was no explosives. Since the date appears relevant for de Menezes death, lets see what the previous day, 21/7 may tell us.

217 > 10 > 1 ( to 111 in QBL tradition)

correctly, exactly. – Does this relate to the copy-cat attack, that it was an exact copy?
food; fatted; fleeing, fugitive; fleet, quickly gliding; bolt, bar. – There were stories that de Menezes ran which were later refuted. fugitive?
to wave; shoot, twig; switch, rod. – shoot
river, stream; the Nile; fosses, moats; channel, mine shaft.  –  No tube stations are discussed in the scriptures on which Gematria is based. Can we interpret tube station as a mine shaft?
is watered.  –  water crops?. Gematria has many references to agriculture. Watering is preparing crops. Can the events of 21/7 be considered preperation for the events of 22/7?
to shoot.  –  to shoot

to be strong. pr.n. “Might”.   –  could be a reference to Kratos.
secrecy, concealment (in speaking or moving); sorcerer; sorcery; mutterings; necromancer; softly, stealthily, secretly.  –  There is certainly secrecy and concealment surrounding the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes. necromancer.
to tread down, destroy.
a shearing; a fleece.  —  fleece, would that be a coat?
to dart, to fly swiftly; rapid flier (a bird of prey), the glede, vulture, kite.  —  are darts bullets? kite


red or ruddy.
sunless, dark; sunset, darkness; concealment; mischance.
wickedness or wrong, pr. n. “Evil” of a tribe in Edom.

What does it mean? It could mean nothing. It could mean that the mock-terrorism of 21 July was a preperation for the killing on the following day. It could mean that the events of 21 july were interpreted through Gematria and acted upon on 22 July.

The bus that expoded on 7 July 2005 had a poster on its side reading ‘Absolute Terror … Bold and Brilliant’

It is claimed that 56 people were killed in the London explosions of 7 July, 2005. 56 throws up 11 > 2 yet again. It is alleged that 13 people were killed in the Tavistock Sq bus explosion (strange that). 13 (6th prime) –  includes  one (1); first; anybody, someone; the same, sole. I wonder if that’s one, the first one, someone – anybody – that looks the same? 13

10 Jan 07  Discussion

I’ve selected numbers carefully. I am fairly confident in the 227 – the date of the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes, 317 the sequence of bullets, the 56 deaths and the 13 deaths on the bus. Except for the 56, they’re all primes. If they’re primes, then they are by definition not random numbers. Except for the 13, they all produce 11 > 2. What’s different about the 13? It’s the alleged number of dead on the bus. That’s on the 8th of July 2005. On the 7th of July 2005 only two people died on the bus. This was outside the British Medical Association and doctors attended immediately. This discrepancy leads me to strongly suspect that it is a significant number – that it is a message.

I am not at all confident about 217 – the day of the copy-cat attacks without real explosives. There are no primes and no discernible pattern.

Let me explain about the 317. Jean Charles de Menezes was shot 7 times in the head, 1 time in the shoulder and 3 shots missed. Does it make sense that skilled marksmen missed 3 times at point blank range? Does it make sense to shoot him in the shoulder after you’ve killed him by shooting him in the head? Does it make sense to shoot him seven times in the head? One’s going to do it, two or three to make sure.

317 also gives a a sharp or new sword; pr.n. “New Built”. The Special Reconnaissence Regiment was formed on 6 April 2005. That’s three and a half months before Jean Charles de Menezes was killed. Wikipedia says

Personnel retain the uniforms of their parent organisations with the addition of the sand coloured beret and the SRR cap badge. The cap badge shares the Sword of Damocles or Excalibur in common with the other SF emblems, in the case of the SRR placed behind a Corinthian helmet surmounting a scroll inscribed RECONNAISSANCE. ”

So there’s your sharp or new sword. UK police are able to demand that soldiers assist them – see Ian Blair’s “copper-bottomed trousers“. It makes sense to use special forces for assassinations because they are above the law. It guarantees that they will not be tried for murder and virtually ensures that the real murderers – Ian Blair under the direction of Cobra and the Civil Contingencies Act i.e. the Blair government – will not be tried for premeditated murder. It explains how the IPCC was refused access to Stockwell station for five days and how there was no CCTV.

Surely it’s illegal for soldiers to be out of uniform whatever Fascist John Reid may claim. It’s unacceptable that this Fascist government is using soldiers to execute unsuspecting members of the public regardless of whether they’re in uniform.

One interesting anomaly I stumbled across while researching. It seems that Charles Clarke was not aware that the Metropolitan Police was following a shoot to kill policy. Although he was Home Secretary at the time, it looks as though he was absent from the Cobra meeting of 21st July 2005 – which is presumably when it was decided to kill somebody. It looks as though a Cobra meeting was planned but an earlier meeting was held in response to the copy-cat events.

Notice that Excalibur Blair-watchers?. Excalibur was also the name of New Labour’s campaigning and rapid rebuttal computer at Millbank circa 1997.

12 Jan 07  More Discussion

11 > 2 repeats.

56 > 11 > 2 The number alleged to have been killed in the London explosions. This number includes the four alleged suicide bombers.

227 > 11 > 2  Date of the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes.

11 > 2 The number of bullets that killed Jean Charles de Menezes regardless of the sequence.

to be continued

‘Grand Hailing Sign of Distress’

13 Feb 2007

Could this ‘police officer’ be a soldier?

Press photographs of members of the armed response team taken in the immediate aftermath of the killing show at least one man carrying a special forces weapon that is not issued to SO19, the Metropolitan police firearms unit.

The man, wearing civilian clothes with a blue cap marked “Police”, was carrying a specially modified Heckler & Koch G3K rifle with a shortened barrel and a butt from a PSG-1 sniper rifle fitted to it — a combination used by the SAS.


Another man, dressed in a T-shirt, jeans and trainers, was carrying a Heckler & Koch G36C. Although this weapon is used on occasion by SO19 it appears to be fitted with a target illuminator purchased as an “urgent operational requirement” for UK special forces involved in the war on terror.


Continue ReadingPrevious Blog: Esoteric Knowledge #3 Jean Charles de Menezes

Previous blog: November 16, 2009 – DRAFT: SCRABBLE SERIES

I had a free blog hosted by from January 2006 to May 2011. My blog at was mysteriously deleted in early December 2008. Here’s a post from my previous blog.


Looks like I’ve started a Scrabble series.

Here we have an example simple program to convert words into their Scrabble score. It could have been written far more efficiently and elegantly but I’ve written it awfully simply so that you see the basic structure. It’s written in python which I believe is very similar to Javascript but it’s likely that this program could be implemented in almost any programming language.

I’ve written it for the English Scrabble letter values so you will need to change the values for different conversions. This short program will also accept phrases although of course phrases are no good for Scrabble. If for some reason you wanted to convert a whole page of text into Scrabble scores I suggest that you expand it to give you a Scrabble score for words and phrases – maybe chop the input up on punctuation, etc.

As the program stands it simply ignores values that are not specified. Different languages will of course have different entries. I hope that it demonstrates how simple it is to achieve simple things with basic programming skills.

Since Scrabble is good for learning and expanding the vocabulary, I expect to be bringing you some example words in the style of Sesame Street. I think that I may start with the word harbinger although that would only be any good in Scrabble if somebody had already used the word ‘arb’. [Edit: ‘harbi’ and ‘harbin’ may be words acceptable under Scrabble rules. There you go, learning already.] I’m not really sure that that’s acceptable under Scrabble rules (have to look it up) and of course somebody else could add an ‘s’ and get a good score.

import sys

letters = {
	'a' : 1,	'A' : 1,
	'b' : 3,	'B' : 3,
	'c' : 3,	'C' : 3,
	'd' : 2,	'D' : 2,
	'e' : 1,	'E' : 1,
	'f' : 4,	'F' : 4,
	'g' : 2,	'G' : 2,
	'h' : 4,	'H' : 4,
	'i' : 1,	'I' : 1,
	'j' : 8,	'J' : 8,
	'k' : 5,	'K' : 5,
	'l' : 1,	'L' : 1,
	'm' : 3,	'M' : 3,
	'n' : 1,	'N' : 1,
	'o' : 1,	'O' : 1,
	'p' : 3,	'P' : 3,
	'q' : 10,	'Q' : 10,
	'r' : 1,	'R' : 1,
	's' : 1,	'S' : 1,
	't' : 1,	'T' : 1,
	'u' : 1,	'U' : 1,
	'v' : 4,	'V' : 4,
	'w' : 4,	'W' : 4,
	'x' : 8,	'X' : 8,
	'y' : 4,	'Y' : 4,
	'z' : 10,	'Z' : 10

while 1:
    word = sys.stdin.readline()
        val = 0
	for i in word:
	    if i in letters:
	        val = val + letters[i]
    print "value is ", val


Continue ReadingPrevious blog: November 16, 2009 – DRAFT: SCRABBLE SERIES

Previous blog: November 14, 2009 – Scrabble

I had a free blog hosted by from January 2006 to May 2011. My blog at was mysteriously deleted in early December 2008. Here’s a post from my previous blog.



It’s drawing towards Christmas and one tradition of Christmas is playing Scrabble with relatives. Scrabble is a very popular board game which I’m sure that you don’t need me to explain. There is a long history of attributing values to letters. In fact, letters serve as numbers in some languages.

I wonder if there’s an online Scrabble I could play…

Continue ReadingPrevious blog: November 14, 2009 – Scrabble

Take a look at these

The Tardis by Disent

The previous On a quiet day, I can hear her breathing blog is due for deletion on 31st May. Mirror before then if you’re interested.

Here are some articles from December 2008 which were reposted after the blog was mysteriously deleted in early December 2008. I’ve not abandoned this line of research and understand far more about it now. Comments are moderated to stop spam but you’re welcome to disagree.

Esoteric Knowledge #3 Jean Charles de Menezes

Dr. Who?

Richmal Marie Oates-Whiteheadt

Blair’s government and Metropolitan Police policy dictated by the Jerusalem Post

Danger of dust explosions on the London Underground

[17/9/12 Links edited from pointing at the previous On a quiet day I can hear her breathing blog.]


Continue ReadingTake a look at these