X

Tony Blair, paedo
Tony Blair, paedo

 

Knox Cunningham …
Cliff Richard …
Jeff Gannon …
Falconer …
Janner …

Blair to Janner “I shall do my best to get you there [the Lords]. It’s not just that I’m fond of you, which I am. It’s not just that you’ve helped me a lot, which you have. It’s because you deserve it.” (you paedo)

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3085573/Mandy-lobbied-Blair-Janner-peerage-sex-abuse-claims-Grandee-said-asked-Labour-leader-ennobling-ahead-1997-election.html

It’s as if it was electioneering … as though it was support me, I’m a paedo …

later: Blair’s message is safe hands because I’m a paedo too, I’ll look after you. Blair is safe hands for establishment paedos.

 

Which Blair minister intervened in supporting a paedo in Lambeth in adopting boys? Was it Blair? We want to know and we deserve to know. Please leak it (& also the Chilcot report).

later: to the Labour Party: He’s a paedo & it’s going to be catastrophic for you. It’s going to be factual. I tend to have a hateful regard of the Labour Party and you will have to deal with it or not. It’s yours. you c**ts. I fought back.

You useless c**ts – the Labour Party allowing a f***ing absolute psychopath to be do so much damage. I curse you with all my might. Get it?

The Labour Party, I salute you

2332596

So that there is no mistake, I am calling you classic original Fascist scum.

You’re all sh**s but there are some that I had contact with. That would be in Newport and Cardiff. Yes, you’re Labour sh**s that I had contact with, particularly that two-faced one in Newport.

So, if you defer to your authoritarian leader – ring his office for instructions, maybe get a little payback for your constituency. If you defer to your glorious, wonderful master does that make you a Fascist? Following orders, supporting the glorious leader. Does that make you a Fascist too? I think so.

Isn’t that what Fascism is? Deference to a glorious war leader? Isn’t that eXactly what you – and the wider Labour Party – did?

Twat Ian Blair with a gun
Twat Ian Blair with a gun
Tony Blair, apparent saviour but soon to be coffin-nail of the UK Labour Party (when exposed as a n***e)
Tony Blair, apparent saviour but soon to be coffin-nail of the UK Labour Party (when exposed as a n***e)

Cressida Dick
Cressida Dick, promoted to IPCC (to handle complaints …)

 

 

 

Er, have we had enough of this shit?

Continue ReadingX

Tony Blair, Terrorist (2)

The BBC reported Building 7 was demolished / fekked / collapsed 23 minuted before it did. I can’t understand this except that it was scripted and Building 7 was late in being collapsed / fekked / demolished. Can it be anything other than following a script? Please explain.

edit: That there was a script to 9/11 that a section of BBC was actively participating in i.e. that would be according to UK government direction. That would be the UK government of Prime Minister Tony Blair.

ed: Please explain. The BBC editors tried …

ed: Just to make absolutely clear: The BBC reported that the Solomon Building also known as Building 7 collapsed. The BBC report was premature and the Soloman building collapsed 23 minutes later.

The BBC reported the premature collapsuation of Building 7 a full 23 minutes before it collapsed – is that a record premature collapsuation?

11/7/14. The purpose of this post is to suggest that the BBC and by extension Tony Blair’s UK government were complicit in the attacks in New York known as 911. I am suggesting that by prematurely announcing the collapse of Building 7, the BBC was following a pre-planned script and that Building 7’s collapse or destruction was delayed according to that script. How else is it explained.

While the BBC is the UK’s state broadcasting corporation, I tend to understand it as comprising of 2 parts: the normal news reporting operation and another section concerned with state propaganda. I do think of these two parts as separate and distinct although the news reporting arm is sometimes biased and misleading.

 

Continue ReadingTony Blair, Terrorist (2)