NHS news review

Spread the love

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles about the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat (Conservative) coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

BMA and royal colleges join forces to oppose Health Bill | GPonline.com

BMA leaders will meet this week with the Royal College of Nursing and other medical royal colleges to build a united front in opposition to the Health Bill.

GPC deputy chairman Dr Richard Vautrey said the intention was to ‘provide a united position against the Health Bill but in support of appropriate changes to the NHS’.

The meeting, planned for Thursday 26 January, follows a wave of attacks on health secretary Andrew Lansley’s NHS reforms.

A House of Commons health select committee report this week warned that NHS services were being ‘salami-sliced’ in a bid to hit the £20bn savings target set by NHS chief executive Sir David Nicholson.

A recent poll of RCGP members found that 98% would back a call for the Health Bill to be withdrawn if this was made in tandem with other royal colleges.

The Royal College of Nursing and the Royal College of Midwives last week declared a policy shift on the Health Bill, declaring their opposition to the Bill ‘in its entirety’.

The BMA has also called for the Health Bill to be withdrawn. Dr Vautrey hit out at Mr Lansley’s response to criticisms of his health reform programme.

‘I don’t think stonewalling in that way is the way to increase engagement with health professionals and patients.

‘I think he at the moment appears to be not fully taking on board the seriousness of the increasing opposition.’

Dr Vautrey added that Mr Lansley had ‘repeatedly outlined his desire for greater clinical engagement and a greater voice for patients’. ‘No one disagrees with that,’ he said. ‘We think he’s going about it in the wrong way.’

It’s not too late to save the NHS from the barbarians | Seumas Milne | Comment is free | The Guardian

To the Tories, health is a huge untapped business opportunity – but the backlash could still derail their privatisation bill

Unless decisive action is taken in the next few weeks, the National Health Service is heading for disaster. The battle over the coalition’s plans to turn England’s NHS inside out has been going on so long, the details are so arcane and claims of concessions so regular, it would be easy to imagine that the worst had been averted and common sense prevailed.

But that could not be further from the case. As the health secretary Andrew Lansley boasted last autumn – after the Conservatives had accepted a “pause” in the progress of their health market and privatisation bill while Liberal Democrats were pacified with cosmetic concessions – its “fundamental principles remain”.

It was a rare moment of candour. As a group of lawyers and health academics spell out in the Lancet medical journal this week, if the health and social care bill is passed in its amended form it will abolish England’s model of “tax-financed, universal healthcare”, pave the way for a “US-style health system” based on “mixed funding” and fatally undermine “entitlement to equality of healthcare provision”.

Meanwhile, the preparations for this lurch towards market-driven private provision – at a cost of £3bn – are already causing havoc with the government’s parallel attempt to drive through the deepest cuts in the history of the NHS.

So the hapless Lansley was on the back foot again yesterday, dismissing as “Westminster nonsense” the onslaught from the Commons health committee, which accused ministers of “salami slicing” NHS services and blamed the reorganisation for creating “disruption and distraction” from the task of effective reform and saving money.

Related: Truth is the casualty in Andrew Lansley’s brave new world – mirror.co.uk

Tories to plunge thousands of children into poverty…|28Jan12|Socialist Worker

The Tories suffered another setback to their brutal Welfare Reform Bill this Monday.

The House of Lords voted to exclude child benefits from the cap, following fears that over 100,000 children would be plunged into poverty.

The bill would impose a cap on benefits of £500 a week for a household.

It is one of a number of attacks on welfare that it hopes would save between £6 billion and £7 billion pounds a year.

But work and pensions secretary Iain Duncan Smith pledges to overturn the Lords’ amendment when the bill returns to the House of Commons.

He says the bill would be “pointless” without the cap on child benefit.

Large sections of the media are cheering him on.

Since the new cap would apply to the whole household rather than individual children, it amounts to a harsh tax on large families.

Economist Tim Leunig calculates that “after rent, council tax and utilities, a family with four children would have 62p per person per day to live on. That is physically impossible.”

NHS workers ordered to leave their homes|28Jan12|Socialist Worker

Hundreds of low paid NHS workers at Guy’s and St Thomas’s trust in London have been told to leave their subsidised accommodation with just three months’ notice.

The trust accommodation office sent a letter to residents earlier this month informing them of its plans to sell off the housing.

The accommodation currently has 800 places for NHS workers, but this number is expected to be cut by around half.

The trust is also imposing a two-year limit on how long people can live in the accommodation. Those remaining will be charged rent at market rates.

This spells disaster for many of the low paid residents living in the homes. Some have been there for up to 20 years.

Continue ReadingNHS news review

NHS news review: Lansley responds to criticism

Spread the love

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles about the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat (Conservative) coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

Health Secretary Andrew Lansley responds to criticism by a committee of MPs by calling their brand new report “out of date” and “unfair”.

MPs criticise Lansley over viability of health cuts / Britain / Home – Morning Star

The government’s controversial NHS shake-up is hindering efforts to find ways of slashing health spending without cutting vital services, MPs warned yesterday.

In a highly critical report, the health select committee said hospitals were resorting to short-term “salami slicing” as they try to find £20 billion in efficiency savings by 2014/15.

But in a stinging criticism of Health Secretary Andrew Lansley’s reorganisation, it said the process “continues to complicate the push for efficiency gains.”

There was a “marked disconnect between the concerns expressed by those responsible for delivering services and the relative optimism of the government” over achieving cuts, the committee noted.

The attack is especially wounding as the committee is chaired by former Tory health minister Stephen Dorrell and is dominated by Conservative and Lib Dem MPs.

It comes days after all the major health unions – representing doctors, nurses and midwives – expressed their “outright opposition” to the Health and Social Care Bill.

The British Medical Association, the Royal College of Nursing and the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges are also holding a summit on Thursday evening to discuss the Bill.

RCN concerns echoed by MPs – RCN

The Royal College of Nursing has today (24 January) responded to a Health Select Committee report into public expenditure saying it agrees that forging ahead with reforms has caused disruption and distraction at a time of austerity within the NHS.

“We concur with the report findings,” said RCN Chief Executive & General Secretary Dr Peter Carter. “We feel that the dual impact of the reform process and the full extent of the efficiency savings is now seriously destabilising the NHS. Indeed, in our opinion the bill has created such turmoil that it should be stopped. Now is the time for the Government to get a grip of the situation and work with organisations such as the RCN to stabilise the health service.”

The findings of the Health Select Committee chime with many of the concerns nursing staff have raised about efficiency savings. RCN research has shown that some NHS trusts are making short-term cuts to services and nursing posts in an attempt to make savings, rather than engaging in intelligent service redesign. The RCN says that in England alone, 48,000 NHS posts are earmarked to go.

“This will undoubtedly have a deep and potentially dangerous impact on patient care,” added Dr Carter. “As the report acknowledged, long-term planning and more integrated health and social care services could provide huge benefits for patient care.

Andrew Lansley: criticism of NHS reforms is ‘out of date and unfair’ – Telegraph

Andrew Lansley, the Health Secretary, has defended his NHS reforms, describing a highly critical report by MPs as “out of date” and “unfair” to the health service.

Mr Lansley insisted that the NHS was delivering efficiency savings and improvements for patients following a warning from MPs that the overhaul of the NHS is hindering efforts to slash health spending without cutting vital services.

“I think the select committee’s report is not only out of date but it is also, I think, unfair to the NHS, because people in the NHS, in hospitals and in the community services are very focused on ensuring that they deliver the best care to patients and that they live within the financial challenges that clearly all of us have at the moment,” Mr Lansley told ITV Daybreak.

“I am afraid the evidence points to the fact that they are doing that extremely well.”

His remarks follow a highly critical report from the Commons Health Select Committee which said hospitals were resorting to short-term “salami slicing” as they try to find £20 billion in efficiency savings by 2014/15.

In a stinging criticism of Mr Lansley’s reorganisation, it said the process “continues to complicate the push for efficiency gains”.

Continue ReadingNHS news review: Lansley responds to criticism

NHS news review

Spread the love

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles about the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat (Conservative) coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

Health reform in new crisis as MPs savage Andrew Lansley’s plans | Politics | The Observer

Andrew Lansley’s health reforms face a fresh crisis as a powerful committee of MPs says the changes are obstructing efforts to make the NHS more efficient and that they fail to address the most urgent health challenge of modern times – how to care better for an expanding elderly population.

A highly critical report by the cross-party select committee on health, due to be published on Tuesday or Wednesday, comes as the medical establishment prepares to stage its own summit on Thursday to discuss concerns over the health and social care bill. The report, a late draft of which has been seen by the Observer, will cause alarm in Downing Street as it is the work of a committee with a Tory and Liberal Democrat majority and is chaired by Stephen Dorrell, a former Conservative health secretary.

One of its key messages is that Lansley’s far-reaching attempts to restructure the NHS in England and devolve more power to GPs are making it more difficult to deliver on a separate target of £20bn of efficiency savings by 2014-15. The report echoes the widespread view in the medical profession that it is deeply unwise to be inflicting far reaching structural reform on the NHS at the same time as asking it to make huge savings.

The MPs say that instead of finding savings by innovation and greater efficiency, many hospitals and trusts are simply cutting services, despite Lansley’s assurances that this would not happen. It says: “The reorganisation process continues to complicate the push for efficiency gains. Although it may have facilitated savings in some cases we heard that it more often creates disruption and distraction that hinders the ability of organisations to consider truly effective ways of reforming service delivery and releasing savings.”

Nick Clegg defends NHS reforms as MPs criticise plans | Society | The Guardian

Nick Clegg has defended the coalition government’s NHS reforms in England, saying the health service could not be “frozen in time”, following a barrage of criticism from a cross-party group of MPs.

The deputy prime minister insisted ministers had gone a long way to allay concerns over the future of the NHS. A report from the Commons health select committee this week, a late draft of which was seen by the Observer, is expected to warn that far-reaching attempts to restructure the NHS will make it more difficult to deliver £20bn of efficiency savings by 2014-15.

Clegg told the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show on Sunday: “We have said there is going to be no privatisation of the NHS by the back door … and that there is a proper way to account for the NHS, but we don’t want people to think that we can freeze [the NHS] in time and it will all be OK.

“I haven’t seen [the report], but of course we will look at it. There is a totally legitimate question [asked by the committee] about how you conduct reform when at the same time you are making savings.”

Clegg said that making people on the front line more responsible for the use of NHS money would help, not hinder. He said: “I think that no one should believe we are helping the NHS by sticking our heads in the sand and saying ‘no change’.”…

Video: Health reforms will push NHS ‘over a cliff’ – Telegraph

Shadow Secretary of State for Health Andy Burnham says that the Government’s controversial health reforms threaten to push the NHS “over a cliff edge”.

Mr Burnham accused the coalition of reneging on its promise not to impose ‘top down reorganisation’ and claimed that the proposed changes to the NHS may be dangerous.

“I think if these changes go ahead it will be the end of the National Health Service as we know it. It will be a plan to put market forces at the very heart of our health services. In essence it is a privatisation plan for the NHS,” said Mr Burnham.

Andrew Lansley’s health reforms are contained in the health and social care bill, which will return to the House of Lords next month. This Thursday the British Medical Association, health workers unions and other interested parties who want the bill scrapped will hold a summit in London.

Continue ReadingNHS news review

NHS news review

Spread the love

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles about the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat (Conservative) coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

Royal Colleges and the BMA (British Medical Association) restate their opposition to evil Con-Dem coalition government attempts to abolish the NHS. Lying scumbag and Health Secretary Andrew Lansley responds by claiming that they actually support his plans despite their repeatedly stated opposition and by accusing them of acting politically.

Huge increases in waiting times.

BMA rejects changes to pension schemes.

NHS cuts, etc

Unions use NHS reforms to ‘have a go at Government’, says Lansley – Health News – Health & Families – The Independent

Relations between the Government and health professionals sank to a new low after Andrew Lansley accused them of opposing his NHS reforms because they were upset about cuts to their pay and pensions.

Union leaders reacted furiously to the Health Secretary’s claim that they wanted “to have a go” at the Government and his suggestion that they were not addressing his NHS shake-up on its merits. Mr Lansley is under fresh pressure after the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) and Royal College of Midwives (RCM) joined the British Medical Association in calling on the Coalition to drop its NHS and Social Care Bill.

Mr Lansley told the BBC the legislation was essential in order to give nurses and doctors clinical leadership. He said: “[The RCN] used to be a professional association that was working with us on professional issues and will carry on doing that, but now the trade union aspect of the Royal College of Nursing has come to the fore, they want to have a go at the Government… about things like pay and pensions.” He added: “It’s a purely political operation.”

Mr Lansley claimed the RCN and RCM supported the principles of the Bill. “What they are actually unhappy about is pay, pensions and jobs. I complete understand that. But if there were no Bill the same issues would have to be addressed. We inherited a deficit, we are having to manage the NHS within limited increases, but actually next year the NHS budget is going to go up by 2.8 per cent.”

Mr Lansley denied suggestions that his decision to allow hospitals to raise 49 per cent of their income from private patients was an issue, as hospitals had no limit at the moment. “You have to see the political nature of this. The RCN does not like private activity,” he said. But Dr Peter Carter, general-secretary of the RCN, rejected Mr Lansley’s claims, saying: “We are disappointed that the Secretary of State would suggest that nurses and healthcare assistants would put self interest before that of patients.”

Related: Health staff tell minister: drop the NHS Bill / Britain / Home – Morning Star

‘Scrap the reforms’ says RCM – Royal College of Midwives

Nurses’ union backs calls to scrap Health Bill | GPonline.com

Physios urge Government to look again at plans for the future of the NHS | The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy

Video: Shadow health secretary: too dangerous to go ahead with NHS reforms – Telegraph

43pc rise in patients waiting too long for NHS treatment since election – Telegraph

The number of hospital patients forced to wait more than 18 weeks for NHS treatment has risen by almost half since the Coalition came to power, new figures show.

In May 2010, 20,662 patients referred for treatment in hospital had to wait longer than the recommended time, according to Department of Health data.

But by last November that figure had grown to 29,508 – an increase of 8,846, or 42.8 per cent.

A third of hospital trusts across England (47) are now failing to meet the goal of 90 per cent of their inpatients being seen within 18 weeks of being referred by a GP – almost four times as many as in the middle of 2010.

The NHS no longer lets GPs like me offer routine operations | Ann Robinson | Comment is free | The Guardian

Healthcare rationing is now everywhere – and don’t think being slim and a non-smoker makes you immune

If you’re overweight or you smoke, you won’t be able to have your hip replaced or your gallbladder removed. Before being put on a waiting list, you’ll have to make efforts to mend your wicked ways. That is what one consortium of GPs in Hertfordshire has decided. And with the government determined to save £60bn from the NHS, it’s unlikely to be the last to agree to this kind of rationing of resources.

Fair enough, you may say. The risks of operations are reduced if you are slim and don’t smoke. Obesity contributes to osteoarthritis of the hip and gallstones, as well as diabetes and high blood pressure. Every smoker in the land must know that they are running an increased risk of lung cancer, and lung and heart disease. Clearly, the risks of anaesthetic complications are higher if you’re a heavy smoker or very fat. And why should slim, non-smoking taxpayers bear the cost of the lumpen puffers?

But this cannot be a defensible position. The Hertfordshire GPs are surely going to have to rethink. Their ruling will potentially affect nearly one quarter of all adults in their area (in 2009 22% of men and 24% of women in England were obese – with a body mass index over 30), and a third of women and nearly half of men if they include overweight people (with a BMI of 25-30). It is completely unrealistic to assume that telling people they can’t go on the waiting list for a much-needed operation until they lose weight will yield any result except despair. Fat is a class issue nowadays. The richer you are, the less likely you are to be fat. Healthy food’s expensive. The factors are complex, and responsibility lies with individuals, schools, health professionals, government and the food and advertising industries – not with a bunch of GPs flexing their commissioning muscle.

BBC News – Cuts hit Welsh NHS patient safety, says Royal College of Nursing

Patient safety in Welsh hospitals is being compromised by a drive to save money, says a nursing union.

The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) says the Welsh government has warned NHS managers to hit financial year-end targets despite a £50m shortfall.

RCN Wales director Tina Donnelly said members in several health boards reported concerns on patient safety.

The Welsh NHS Confederation denied safety was being undermined and said it remained a priority.

Ms Donnelly said nurses had reported having to work shifts with reduced staff numbers, as well as experiencing shortages of basics such as bed linen.

“They really are finding it very, very difficult in the last three months of this financial year,” she said.

“Staffing levels are a lot lower and also their grading is being reduced, which reduces the level of supervision which they are able to have in clinical practice.”

BMA rejects proposed changes to NHS Pension Scheme – HR News, Talent Management News, HR Jobs, Senior HR Jobs | askGrapevine HR

The British Medical Association (BMA) is urging the government to reconsider their pension plans as thousands of doctors may take industrial action.

A meeting of BMA Council, the association’s governing body, resulted in the decision to reject the government’s recent pension propositions – in support of the views of tens of thousands of doctors and medical students.

A national survey of 46,000 found that 84% wanted to reject the latest proposals, while 63% would be willing to take industrial action to pursue changes. Over a third of doctors aged 50 and over said they will retire early if the current changes go ahead.

The government’s current proposals include a rise in members’ contributions, those that currently pay 8.5% will pay 14.5%, an increase in the Normal Pension Age resulting in new doctors having to work until they are 68 and a change in pension accrual methods, to a career average revalued earnings (CARE) scheme for all doctors.

Dr Hamish Meldrum, Chairman, BMA Council says: “Doctors are at the forefront of attempts to save the NHS £20 billion, while trying to protect patient care, are in the midst of huge system reform in England, which is causing chaos in many areas, and are about to enter a fourth successive year of a pay freeze.

“Now on top of this, they are facing wholesale changes to their pension scheme, which was radically overhauled less than four years ago and is actually delivering a positive cashflow to the Treasury.

“Industrial action remains a last resort and the Government must urgently reconsider its damaging plans. The action we are considering is unprecedented in recent decades. This demonstrates the current level of discontent among NHS staff.”

27/11/13 Having received a takedown notice from the Independent newspaper for a different posting, I have reviewed this article which links to an article at the Independent’s website in order to attempt to ensure conformance with copyright laws.

I consider this posting to comply with copyright laws since
a. Only a small portion of the original article has been quoted satisfying the fair use criteria, and / or
b. This posting satisfies the requirements of a derivative work.

Please be assured that this blog is a non-commercial blog (weblog) which does not feature advertising and has not ever produced any income.

dizzy

Continue ReadingNHS news review