NHS news review

Spread the love

A leaked memo reveals that the Health Secretary will not remain responsible for the NHS despite repeated ConDem assurances that he would. You can’t trust the Tories – or the Lib-Dem Tories – with the NHS.

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles about the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat (Conservative) coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

NHS power will be held by quango, leaked document reveals | Society | The Guardian

Malcolm Grant, the government’s choice to run the powerful NHS commissioning board, makes remarkable admission

The health secretary will “franchise” the running of the NHS to a quango for up to three years at a time – a move that will result in an unelected academic and the nation’s 38,000 family doctors, rather than ministers, being accountable for the day-to-day running of the health service, according to leaked documents obtained by the Guardian.

In unpublished evidence to the health select committee last week, Malcolm Grant, the government’s choice to run the powerful NHS commissioning board, outlined “an extraordinary transformation of responsibility” that appears to undermine claims by ministers that the proposed legislation will not dilute the government’s constitutional responsibilities to the health service.

At present, the cabinet minister for health has a “duty to provide a national health service” in England, but that disappears in the NHS bill’s proposals.

Grant, a law professor who runs University College London, told MPs that, under the new system, the secretary of state “mandates” the commissioning board to run the NHS every “two … possibly three years” and then retreats into the shadows. The board will hand over taxpayers’ cash to groups of GPs to buy services on behalf of patients.

He admitted there would be “a fundamental change of responsibility and accountability under the bill” because about £80bn of public money would be transferred to the board and GPs. He said these two groups – not politicians – would run the NHS and ensure patients received an adequate level of health provision in England.

“If [GPs] are dissatisfied with what happens in a hospital, they need to deal with it and not simply complain to a secretary of state who no longer has this responsibility, nor to the commissioning board which has given them the responsibility, but to complain to the hospital and get it sorted, and, if it is not sorted, to use their commissioning power to ensure that it is.”

With peers beginning line-by-line scrutiny of the coalition’s NHS bill on Tuesday, the government has been attempting to rebut detractors of all political persuasions influenced by the powerful Lords constitutional committee.

The committee warned last month about the “extent to which the chain of constitutional responsibility as regard to the NHS [will be] severed”. In what is perceived as a sign of panic over the level of peers’ opposition, a 72-page letter from ministers sent to all peers last week conceded a “necessary amendment” might be needed to rectify the impression the government would not be “responsible and accountable” for the NHS.

UNISON Press | Press Releases Front Page

UNISON, the largest health union, said today that its worst fears for accountability in the NHS were being realised. Leaked documents have today revealed that the Secretary of State for Health would lose accountability for the health service, under plans set out in the Health and Social Care Bill.

Christina McAnea, UNISON Head of Health, said:

“Here are our worst fears for NHS accountability realised. We have long been warning that the Bill would mean the Secretary of State for Health would lose accountability for the health service – and here is the proof. This is just another reason why the Bill represents the end of the NHS as we know it.

“But all is not lost – line by line scrutiny in the Lords begins tomorrow. If peers vote to amend Clauses 1 and 4 of the Health Bill, it could keep the Secretary of State ultimately responsible for the health service. We are calling on them to do so.”

GPs fear NHS reforms will lead to patients losing faith in care – Main Section – Yorkshire Post

RELATIONSHIPS between family doctors and their patients could be damaged by the Government’s controversial NHS reforms, according to new research published today.

The findings are revealed in a study published by the British Medical Association (BMA), which is described by the association as being the “most significant survey of GP opinion in recent years”.

Every family doctor in the UK was approached to take part in the research and around 40 per cent – 18,757 out of a possible 46,700 GPs – responded.

The figures show that seven out of 10 GPs are concerned about conflicts of interest resulting from the NHS reforms, and the same number also say they are concerned about the impact the Health and Social Care Bill could have on the patient-doctor relationship.

Sixty-nine per cent of doctors, meanwhile, say they are worried about their proposed role as both the commissioners and providers of care.

Dr Laurence Buckman, chairman of the BMA’s GPs Committee, said: “The huge response rate shows how strongly GPs feel about the topics in question, particularly when it comes to the changes being made to the health service in England.

“GPs do not want the trust patients put in them to be damaged by these reforms, yet this is exactly what they fear will happen.

“The Government must take heed and further revise its plans for the quality premium in particular, to avoid any potential damage to the doctor-patient relationship.”

The BMA said the results of the study should “serve as a crucial measure of GP opinion for years to come.”

Some three quarters of GPs said they do not agree with the Government’s proposals to link practice income to the performance of their commissioning group, while 85 per cent do not believe that practice boundaries should be abolished.

Other findings show that 88 per cent of doctors say the “intensity of their consultations” has increased in the last five years, while 84 per cent say the “complexity of their consultations” has increased over the same period of time.

Dr Buckman added: “General practice has undergone huge change since the last time we carried out a survey of this size in 2007 – and this is shown clearly by the belief among the vast majority of GPs that the nature of their work has become more complex and intense.

“Much of the work we do now, such as looking after people with diabetes, used to be done in hospital and even though it’s work we want to do because of the clear benefit to patients, it has made it harder to fit a consultation into a ten-minute time slot and it can make it more difficult to deal with surges in demand.

“I’d like to thank all the GPs who filled in the survey as it has given us a great insight into the GP workforce.

“It will be invaluable in shaping our priorities in the months and years ahead.”

Continue ReadingNHS news review

NHS news review

Spread the love

Dr. Clare Gerada was featured in yesterday’s NHS news review discussing the Health and Social Care / Destroy the NHS Bill incentivising GPs to restrict treatment and the consequent pressures on the relationship between GPs and their patients. The RCGP Annual Conference at Liverpool is to discuss similar issues later today

http://www.rcgp.org.uk/PDF/Programme%20for%20web%20OCT.pdf

The moral maze: the affordability of future health care

Chair: Dr Richard Horton, Editor, Lancet

Panel of speaker to be confirmed:

Baroness Julia Cumberlege
Dr Clare Gerada, Chair of Council, RCGP
Sir Michael Rawlins, Chairman, NICE
Ben Page, Chief Executive, Ipsos MORI
Dr Hamish Meldrum, Chairman of Council, BMA

Scottish Nationalist Party (SNP) accuses the ConDem coalition of destroying the NHS.

Conservative election poster 2010

A recent news article about the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat (Conservative) coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

BBC News – SNP conference: UK government ‘breaking up NHS’

Scotland’s health secretary will accuse the UK government of trying to break up the NHS, in her speech to the SNP conference.

Nicola Sturgeon will tell delegates in Inverness that health service reforms in England amount to an experiment in privatisation.

Scottish ministers say they will protect NHS spending.

Deputy SNP leader Ms Sturgeon will also pledge to stop pensioners languishing in hospital beds.

The UK government’s controversial Health and Social Care Bill aims to increase competition and give clinicians control of budgets.

It says the changes are vital to help the NHS cope with the demands of an ageing population, the costs of new drugs and treatments and the impact of lifestyle factors, such as obesity.

But the legislation has already been substantially altered, following criticism from NHS staff and Liberal Democrat MPs.

Ms Sturgeon, who is also Scotland’s deputy first minister, will tell day two of the conference: “It now seems inevitable that the Tories, aided and abetted by their Liberal partners, will break up the NHS in England.

“Let me make this clear, the NHS in Scotland will remain a public service, paid for by the public and accountable to the public.

“There will be no privatisation of the NHS in Scotland.”

The health secretary will say: “I say that not out of blind ideology, though I have always thought that the ideology of a health service in public hands and free at the point of need is a rather fine one, I say it because I have no doubt that our NHS can and will outperform the privatised experiment south of the border.”

Continue ReadingNHS news review

NHS news review

Spread the love

Dr. Clare Gerada, chair of the Royal College of GPs is in the news today. She warns that the Health and Social Care / Destroy the NHS Bill is damaging the relationship of trust between GPs and patients, warns of a two-tier health system run like a budget airline and suggests that GP practices should explore alternative models of organisation to GP partnerships.

NHS cuts

SMEs are concerned at the ConDem govenment’s destruction of the NHS and nasty changes to the welfare benefits system.

Private doctors treat healthier patients.

Medical students…

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles about the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat (Conservative) coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

NHS bill threatens trust in GPs, says doctors’ leader | Society | The Guardian

NHS bill will lead to situation where healthcare is like budget airline with limited seats, says chair of Royal College of GPs

The NHS shake-up risks wrecking GPs’ relationship with their patients by turning them into rationers of care who deny the sick the treatment they need, warns the chair of the Royal College of GPs.

Family doctors could be “compromised” by having to decide between providing sick patients with the best possible treatment or meeting financial targets, according to Dr Clare Gerada.

Giving GPs control of health budgets, the cornerstone of health secretary Andrew Lansley’s restructuring of the NHS in England, could diminish the trust between patients and family doctors, she will tell the college’s annual conference.

“We must not risk long-term benefits being sacrificed in favour of short-term savings,” Gerada will tell the audience of 1,500 GPs in Liverpool. “How soon will it be, for example, before we stop referring for cochlear implant? An expensive intervention but one that in the long term saves enormous amounts of public money. But not a saving from our budget.

“How long will it be before we find ourselves injecting a patient’s knee joint – at Injections-R-us PLC – instead of referring to an orthopaedic surgeon for a knee replacement?”

In a detailed critique of Lansley’s health and social care bill, she will warn that: “As doctors we risk being compromised. We’ll have to choose between the best interests of our patients and those of the commissioning group’s purse. And, to make matters worse, we’ll also be rewarded for staying in budget – and not spending the money on restoring the child’s hearing. Now that’s what I call a perverse incentive.”

Her warning reflects widespread concern among doctors that exercising their financial responsibilities will lead some patients to believe they have been refused treatment on grounds of cost.

Lansley’s reforms also threaten to create a two-tier health service where the well-off can beat queues by paying for fast treatment as private patients in NHS hospitals, because of the proposed easing of the amount which foundation trust hospitals can earn from that source.

“I worry we’re heading towards a situation where healthcare will be like a budget airline. There will be two queues: one queue for those who can afford to pay, and another for those who can’t. Seats will be limited to those who muscle in first, and the rest will be left stranded on the tarmac.”

The British Medical Association, which represents hospital doctors as well as GPs, said it shared Gerada’s concerns.

“In general, we would agree with Clare Gerada’s comments about the impact of the health and social care bill. The BMA has concerns about the conflicts of interest inherent in the bill as well as the effects of the market on healthcare, and her comments fit with the views of most doctors,” said a spokeswoman for the BMA, which wants the bill withdrawn or substantially amended.

A Department of Health spokesperson said: “The NHS is not for sale and this government is committed to a real terms increase in funding for it. We want to give GPs the power and control to make the right decisions on behalf of their patients.

“Talk of budget airlines is nonsense pure and simple. In the new NHS, everyone will fly first class. Quality will improve as both patients and frontline staff are able to make choices.

NHS doctors are under pressure to replace caring with market values | Clare Gerada | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk


When I come home from work and my son asks me what sort of day I’ve had, on a good day I want to be able to say “I saved a life”, not “I met a budget”.

Of course, it’s important that GPs are mindful of resources. We have a responsibility to spend the public’s money carefully and wisely. That goes without saying.

But we must never lose sight of the patient as a person, at the heart of our practice. Patients are not “commodities” to be bought and sold in the health marketplace.

In this brave new cost-driven, competitive, managed-care world, I worry about the effect the language of marketing is having on our clinical relationships.

It’s changing the precious relationship between clinician and patient into a crudely costed financial procedure. Turning our patients into aliquots of costed tariffs and us into financial managers of care.

We are already embracing the language of the market when we talk about, for example, care pathways, case management, demand management, productivity, clinical and financial alignment, risk stratification.

We’re already accused of making “inappropriate referrals” whenever we put what’s best for our patients above what’s best for saving money.

We’re being forced to comply with referral protocols and so-called rules-based medicine, in an effort to control medical care before it’s delivered.

Referral management systems – already widespread – place a hidden stranger in the consulting room. A hidden stranger who interferes with decisions that should be made by GPs in partnership with their patients.

Insulting terms, like “frequent flyers”, are being used to describe people who are sick and need our care and attention.

The archbishop of Canterbury attacked what he described as “the quiet resurgence of the seductive language of the deserving and undeserving poor”. If we don’t watch out, the deserving and undeserving poor could soon be joined by the deserving and undeserving sick.

I worry we’re heading towards a situation where healthcare will be like a budget airline. There’ll be two queues: one queue for those who can afford to pay, and another for those who can’t. Seats will be limited to those who muscle in first. And the rest will be left stranded on the tarmac.

This can’t be right. After all, no one chooses to be sick. We must hold fast to the principle that good healthcare should be available to all, regardless of wealth.

Gerada: We need to move on from GP partnerships – Pulse

GPs need to forget about the partnership model and look at new models of organising their practices, such as federations, says RCGP chair Dr Clare Gerada.

In a sometimes heated discussion over the lack of partnership opportunities for salaried GPs, Dr Gerada urged GPs to stop talking about the partner/salaried divide, saying that model belonged to the last century.

Delegates attending a ‘Partnership Debate’ at the RCGP annual conference backed a motion that the profession was doing new GPs ‘a disservice with a lack of partnership opportunities’, but RCGP leaders urged the profession to think more laterally about how the profession is organised.

Dr Gerada, a GP in Kennington whose practice employs around 100 salaried GPs, admitted the partnership debate was ‘complex’ but argued that a ‘new model’ of general practice was needed in the 21st Century.

She said: ‘I think we should stop talking about the salaried/partnership divide. I think we should start talking about federating – joining and collaborating across practices, sharing expertise and resources.’

‘While the partnership model may be the model for the 20th Century I think we need to move on and find a new model.’

Pontefract Hospital A&E will close overnight – Lifestyle – Pontefract Express

NIGHT time closure of Pontefract Hospital’s A&E department will start next month, it has been decided today (Thursday October 20).

At a public meeting of the Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust all but one member of the board voted in favour of proposals which will see the unit shut from 10pm to 8am from November 1.

At the meeting at Pinderfields Hospital, Wakefield, the trust said the closure was due to staffing levels, adding if enough doctors at the right level could be recruited the opening hours would be reassessed.

SMEs fear cost of NHS and welfare reforms – IFAonline

More than half of SME employers fear the cost impact of the government’s health and welfare reforms, according to Jelf Group.

As a result it called for the House of Lords to help prevent potentially severe consequences and examine the effects on business of the new regimes.

The employee benefits intermediary conducted a poll of 169 SME businesses at a recent seminar and found 55% worried about the reform’s implications.

It suggested the main reasons that employers were fearful of increased financial pressures came from government overhauls of the NHS and welfare systems.

“Anecdotal evidence of increased waiting lists on the NHS may mean key employees take longer to return to the workplace,” it said.

“In the current economic climate this could be catastrophic for marginally profitable employers and even worse for fledgling business yet to make a return.

Management in Practice – Private sector ‘treats healthier patients’

Patients seen in independent sector treatment centres (ISTCs) tend to be younger, in better health and from “far more affluent areas” than those seen by NHS hospitals, research suggests.

The research, published in the British Medical Journal, also shows patients undergoing surgery in ISTCs had “slightly better outcomes” than patients treated in NHS centres.

However, the researchers claim such differences are “minor” and “unlikely to be clinically significant”.

The researchers, led by Professor Jan van der Meulen at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, claims the study proves ISTCs treat patients with a more “favourable mix case profile”.

Yet, they also claim the results of their research “lessons concerns that ISTCs are ‘cherry picking’ the healthiest patients.”

“Our findings support the idea that separating elective surgical care from emergency services could improve the quality of care,” said the researchers.

 

 

 

Continue ReadingNHS news review

NHS news review

Spread the love

The government’s preferred candidate to head the NHS Commissioning Board has described the Health and Social Care / Destroy the NHS Bill as “unintelligable” despite being coached by the Department of Health.

Increasing waiting lists.

Frenchay Hospital in North Bristol to be ‘part-privatised’.

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles about the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat (Conservative) coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

Health Bill ‘unintelligible’ says controversial new NCB chairman | GPonline.com

The new chairman of the NHS Commissioning Board (NCB) has been accused of lacking experience and understanding of the NHS and has described the Health Bill as ‘unintelligible’.

Members of the House of Commons health select committee were split along party lines over the appointment of Professor Malcolm Grant.

All three Labour committee members present at a hearing with Professor Grant voted against endorsing his candidacy for the role. But the two Conservative and one Liberal Democrat MPs present backed him, along with committee chairman Stephen Dorrell, also a Conservative.

An amendment backed by the Labour MPs warned that Professor Grant ‘demonstrated a lack of experience of NHS structures and processes’ and did not demonstrate a ‘robust understanding of the issues affecting the NHS’.

He had acknowledged being primed with answers by the DoH before facing the committee of MPs, was unclear about his role and about how the NCB would secure service changes locally, it said.

The amendment pointed out that he had referred to the Health Bill as ‘unintelligible’ and said that he had not convinced members of the committee that he would be ‘an effective counterbalance to executive members’ of the NCB.

Related: ‘Unintelligible’ health bill is chance to empower GPs, says prospective NHS Board Chief – Pulse

Waiting times on NHS show a 60pc jump « Express & Star

The number of NHS patients waiting longer than a year to be treated in the Black Country and Staffordshire has jumped by almost 60 per cent, new figures revealed today.

The only hospital to cut the number of patients waiting longer than a year was Stafford Hospital, where the numbers fell from 45 down to 18.

Nationally, thousands of people are being left to wait for longer than a year because hospitals prioritise those patients they can treat within Government targets and, therefore, avoid health authority penalties.

The NHS should treat every patient within 18 weeks of them being referred by their GP.

If hospitals miss the targets they can be penalised but there is no incentive to treat those waiting beyond the target times.

Cambridge News | Health-and-Beauty | Health-News | £14m cuts axe set to fall on mental health services

MENTAL health services will be slashed across Cambridgeshire in a bid to save £14 million, if proposals are given the go-ahead.

A 13-week public consultation has been launched as local health providers announced a host of proposed facility closures and mergers as part of a three-year cost-cutting measure.

The plans involve reducing eight inpatient wards to six, which will reduce the number of beds available from 28 to 16.

Concerns over plans to ‘part-privatise’ Frenchay Hospital (From Gazette Series)

Concerns over plans to ‘part-privatise’ Frenchay Hospital

CONCERNS have been raised over NHS plans to ‘part-privatise’ one of the region’s oldest hospitals.

Councillors in South Gloucestershire said they had been shocked at news the contract to run Frenchay Hospital would be outsourced to the private sector when it is downgraded to a health and social care unit.

Cllr Ian Scott (Labour, Filton), said: “This revelation came completely out of the blue.

“I don’t think anyone ever expected that the new community hospital at Frenchay would not stay entirely within the NHS.”

North Bristol Trust (NBT), which currently runs Frenchay, has announced that although doctors, therapists, staff operating diagnostic equipment and secretarial support will be NHS, the overall running of the community hospital will be operated privately when it opens in 2014. In addition, nurses in charge of 68 beds at a new rehabilitation centre will also be private. NBT chief executive Ruth Brunt said the move would make the project financially viable.

Continue ReadingNHS news review