Article by Chauncey K. Robinson republished from Peoples World under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).
WASHINGTON—Just weeks after the United Nations Environment Programme released its grim report concerning climate change and the future of humanity, the Trump administration has repealed pollution limits on fossil fuel power plants. This rule change is happening despite the fact that power plants are the second-largest source of greenhouse gas emissions—the very same emissions scientists and climate activists say are the cause of global warming.
The reversal was announced by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin at the G20 Energy Abundance Ministerial Meeting on Sept. 14 in Houston. He claimed the move “delivers reliable and affordable energy in the largest power sector deregulatory action in U.S. history,” and that it is “expected to unleash the full potential of America’s vast energy resources, including coal and natural gas.”
Zeldin alleged that former Presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama implemented “a war on coal to destroy reliable and affordable energy” and boasted that the Trump administration “has come to protect American energy.”
The administrator’s comments continue a pattern where the EPA, under a president who said climate change is the “greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world,” has prioritized exalting the fossil fuel industry and thwarting the growth of clean energy initiatives such as solar, wind, and hydropower.
In February, Trump announced the official termination of the EPA’s 2009 landmark determination that greenhouse gases warm the planet and threaten the health and welfare of those who inhabit it. In 2025, the president referred to oil as “liquid gold” and created the National Energy Dominance Council as a means to expand U.S. fossil fuel and energy production.
Doug Burgum, who serves as secretary of the Department of the Interior (DOI) and chairs Trump’s National Energy Dominance Council, stood alongside Zeldin during the announcement on power plants. He claimed that the EPA’s repeal of pollution rules would save Americans “hundreds of millions of dollars” and put an end to “the Biden administration’s disastrous Green New Scam policies.”
The EPA’s lofty claim of delivering $300+ billion in savings to Americans might sound appealing in the middle of an affordability crisis, but independent researchers and advocates question whether Trump’s EPA is making false promises and ignoring the science.
While Zeldin and his colleagues claim that during periods of peak electricity demand coal and natural gas continue to “keep the lights on,” recent reports show that coal is actually driving higher utility costs for consumers. The non-partisan think tank Energy Innovation noted that coal power was 28% more expensive in 2024 than in 2021 and that “coal’s already poor economics are getting worse as aging plants make coal power more expensive.” The organization also referred to another study that showed “coal plants were more expensive to continue operating compared to replacement with local wind or solar.”
In nearly every part of the United States, people are seeing a rapid rise in their energy costs lately. Electricity and home energy bills have risen faster than inflation—climbing an estimated 21% to 30% over a three to four year period. The quick jump for power bills has been attributed to a number of influences.
The top two reasons experts point to are, first, the high energy demand of AI data centers straining existing energy capacity (data centers which Trump champions) and, second, the extreme weather of hotter summers and freezing winters resulting from the climate change that the president doesn’t believe in.
In a press release announcing the power plant pollution rule elimination, the EPA maintained that “models” show greenhouse gas emissions from power plants have no “material impact on global climate change.” The claim provided no details on what models the agency was referring to or what science it relied on to make such an assessment.
Environmental advocates and scientists paint a different picture, one where continued pollution will impose detrimental costs for millions, both medically and financially.
Resources for the Future, an independent nonprofit research institution based in Washington, asserts that any savings made from the EPA’s continued deregulation of fossil fuels will be surpassed by the health damages many people will face as a result of increased emissions. The organization estimates that the free flow of power plant air pollution will increase health issues among the public, bringing additional health costs of up to $476 billion.
Advocates, political leaders, and medical professionals are also sounding the alarm on what they see as the immense danger the latest EPA move poses to working people.
“The administration is once again green-lighting massive corporate pollution with no regard to how it will harm our environment, climate, or Hoosiers struggling to afford their daily lives,” said Robyn Skuya-Boss, director of the Sierra Club Hoosier Chapter in Indiana. Last year, that state’s coal plants released more than 5.2 million metric tons of carbon dioxide.
“These protections have been essential guardrails to improving the health and safety of our communities from soot, smog, and toxic air pollutants. This dirty and dangerous rollback comes at the same time the administration is using illegal bailout orders to keep two of Indiana’s coal plants online at Hoosiers’ expense rather than close as planned in December 2025.
“Over and over again, the Trump administration demonstrates it cares more about forcing Indiana to burn coal than it does the health and welfare of Hoosiers,” Skuya-Boss asserted.
Sierra Club Chief Program Officer Holly Bender told the press that Trump’s EPA actions were a “full-throated climate denial while the climate crisis happens in real time.” The move is a “shocking betrayal of the American public,” she declared.
“While wildfires rage, floods devastate communities, and families struggle to afford skyrocketing electricity bills and insurance premiums, the Trump administration is handing the fossil fuel industry a license to keep polluting,” Bender said.
American Lung Association President and CEO Harold Wimmer noted in a statement that leaving the rules in place would have “resulted in other immediate health benefits,” such as reducing emissions of harmful oxides of nitrogen, sulfur dioxide, and particulate matter from coal-fired power plants, preventing “1,200 premature deaths in 2035.”
Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey said, “American families and businesses will pay for President Trump’s reckless failure to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants. By giving power plants a free pass to pump industrial carbon pollution into our communities, the EPA will saddle people with the bill for more expensive electricity, respiratory illnesses, and climate change-fueled disasters.”
The governor added, “Nobody wants this, and nobody can afford this,” saying the Trump administration has lost all credibility on energy and that the American public can’t afford more “endless wars driving up gas prices” and further reliance on “dirty coal plants.”
Rep. Adelita S. Grijalva, D-Ariz., asserted that the president and his administration is “once again prioritizing corporate profits over lower utility bills and the health of working families.”
Though the Trump administration is wasting no time in moving forward with its fossil fuel initiatives, the fight for clean air may not be over just yet. Just days after Zedlin’s announcement, a number of organizations have come forward to sue the administration to stop the rule elimination.
The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), American Lung Association, American Public Health Association, Clean Air Council, Clean Wisconsin, and the Environmental Defense Fund filed suit, alleging that the EPA was failing in its “legal responsibility to protect health and the environment.”
The federal climate legal director at NRDC, Meredith Hankins, wrote in a statement: “The Clean Air Act and Supreme Court precedent demand that the EPA address climate pollution from the largest industrial source in the nation. The EPA’s legal reasoning is fatally flawed, so we are going to court.”
No paywalls at People’s World
We hope you appreciated this article. At People’s World, we believe news and information should be free and accessible to all, but we need your help. Our journalism is free of corporate influence and paywalls because we are totally reader-supported. Only you, our readers and supporters, make this possible. If you enjoy reading People’s World and the stories we bring you, please support our work by donating or becoming a monthly sustainer today. Thank you!
Article by Chauncey K. Robinson republished from Peoples World under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).
A document filed by US prosecutors ahead of Delo’s sentencing
A document filed by US prosecutors ahead of Delo’s sentencing
Documents filed by the US attorney against BitMEX
