VIP paedos
Australia’s 60 Minutes does a special on Britain’s VIP paedophiles.
!I wonder who that prominent politician mentioned is …
Video: Kincora was used for ‘political leverage’ – Richard Kerr
More relevent articles at the exaronews site.
DRAFT, to be expanded: Charlie Hebdo false-flag in Paris
“In some ways she was far more acute than Winston, and far less susceptible to Party propaganda. Once when he happened in some connection to mention the war against Eurasia, she startled him by saying casually that in her opinion the war was not happening. The rocket bombs which fell daily on London were probably fired by the Government of Oceania itself, ‘just to keep people frightened’. This was an idea that had literally never occurred to him. She also stirred a sort of envy in him by telling him that during the Two Minutes Hate her great difficulty was to avoid bursting out laughing.” George Orwell, 1984
As it’s becoming increasingly clear that the Charlie Hebdo attack on cartoonists in Paris was fake, manufactured terrorism I need to point some things out. I apologise this is basically in note form at the moment.
Repeated false-flag events. 9/11 was clearly not the first, [?Madrid? NB days after 911], London, Paris [most likely Mumbai too]
The joke they play – killing their own people. Warning given.
Surprised at the French people being taken in – are they or just some?
Police, politicians, journalists permit this to happen. For example, police, politicians and journalists conspired in the murder of an unsuspecting foreign national by a foreign national gang (on the tube).
A Fascist state – not democracy. A small, organised criminal cabal in charge with state institutions subservient to it. Similar to P2 in Italy. Neo-Con scum. Deception as per teachings of Levi Strauss. That Muslims are being demonised as Jews were.
Political parties beholden to them – relate to TTIP i.e. totally contrary to public interest, democracy but for the benefit of the small wealthy elite.
Labour Party just as bad as the Conservatives / Conservative Lib-Dems. Ed Balls & Mandy Mandelson (although New Labour, current LP no discernible difference to Tories) at Bilderberg. Did Blair attend? Blair did attend and lied to parliament about attending. Tiny filthy rich minority getting filthy richer.
Conveniently-timed deaths and suicidings. For Blair John Smith, David Kelly, Robin Cook (who was a challenge, on tour).
Relate to paedophilia – that paedophilia is a way to control politicians, Blair’s cabinet [There may be an assumption that the Blair minister involved in exerting influence so that a convicted paedo child care home supervisor in South London could adopt children is mandy. I don’t assume that and my working hypothesis is that there were many paedos in Blair’s cabinet – as is the case in previous cabinets.], Kitty, Blair’s entertainment in Washington.
People have to stand up to them & they should be held accountable under the law. They are organised criminals.
Researching Blair back in 2006/7 and coming across paedo all the time
and I was doubting where my research was taking me
I was developing hypotheses … supplying boys … supplying drugs
Everything about Him was that the shop was open
I was doubting myself ~ why was I coming to paedo, why was it paedo all the time?
Why was any theory or avenue I was researching coming up paedo?
…
My working hypothesis now is that paedos engage in politics and the judiciary, that their paedoness is their incentive to attain high office beyond the reach of the law.
There is a subsidiary hypothesis that they are identified as paedos and then owned .
It certainly appears that privileged paedos were able to quite literally shaft the working class with immunity. I’m starting to think that was important for them.
It obviously didn’t stop with the Thatcher government because there’s a Blair minister. ed: with Thatcher it looks deliberate that there were so many. I’m not sure if Blair’s government was different.
Labour peer’s letters to care home boy
The Guardian: Questions over Labour peer’s letters to care home boy reports “Despite allegations about the peer, no action was taken and he was robustly defended by a number of politicians, including at least one prominent MP who has been openly critical of the government’s response to allegations of historical child abuse by MPs and peers.”
I find it strange that the Guardian was not willing to name Greville Janner. Hardly a secret is it?
No action was taken despite such a letter appearing in court. I wonder who that one prominent MP is.
Nick Clegg, Leon Brittan, PIE, paedo
Nick Clegg, Leon Brittan, PIE, paedo …
Nick Clegg is very keen to not be associated with Leon Brittan … but didn’t he work in Leon Brittan’s office?
Is it more than Nick Clegg is a Conservative? I think that (it) is established – he was at (a Conservative at) University and there is the Blue ‘Yellow’ Orange Book.
Leon Brittan. I’m certainly forming the impression that She got a gang of very sexually predatory on young people around her deliberately. I am have also have a very strong impression (or more) that this continued into the Blair years and that it may well be the way of Westminster …
later: Leon Brittan is prominent in Barnes (and Private Eye ;)
Later: Leon Brittan – as Thatcher’s Home Secretary didn’t act against PIE, the Paedophile Information Exchange. I don’t wonder why
edit: it may be worth thinking about how She protected them – there may be a pattern.
2am This may be about Nick Clegg and Leon Brittan.
Nick Clegg was a Tory at university and worked in Leon Brittans’ office afterwards. There’s more to it that that.
Nick Clegg hides the fact that he was a Tory and that he worked in the Tory office of Leon Brittan. Leon Brittan is very so obviously very suspect. FM just leave the kids alone.
Times have changed
er, but that’s no excuse for being a totally nasty bastard
Later: I am available to be employed as a consultant (conditions apply)
Later later: That’s a mistake, no? I did have a blanket last time I was in the cells – but shouldn’t everyone deserve a blanket without scabies and a cup of tea without pubes? Yes, even those protesters. Isn’t the point about democracy is that you can object? I think so. And I hate starting a sentence with and but lets consider the idea of democracy. [edit: I don’t think that makes sense but then it is nearing 3am and I am drunk.]
continuing .
We have general elections in UK every five years. The problem here is that they make promises, they are elected on the basis of those promises but they don’t then keep those promises.
For example, Cameron said no top down reorganisation of the NHS. He’s totally renaged on his pre-election promise / commitment there. I think that he lied. It’s for you to decide if he lied. But he did.
How are these people different from criminals?
3am The point about protesters/demonstrators is that everyone in a democratic society have and – I think – an absolute right to show their opposition to how they are governed. I think that this is central to a democracy – it’s more than that challenges should be heared and considered. It’s also about being denied any medium of expression apart from demonstrating.
I submit that demonstrations and protests should be facilitated in any democratic society and that it is a legitimate political expressions.
Further: I consider that demonstrations of all political persuasions (should be) are facilitated. Counter-demonstrations should have the same regard for their rights.
edit: I suggest that political expression of all sorts should be facilitated in a democratic society. That includes protest/demonstration and counter protest/demonstration
edit: This post was originally about Nick Clegg and his being a Tory from his University days, and that he served as a Tory in Leon Brittan’s office in URUP (Europe). It should be known that Nick Clegg was a Tory and worked in Leon Brittan’s office but he’s pretending otherwise. That’s a matter of fact that Nick Clegg is hiding.
This post has gone beyond that as they do on my blog. I suggest and submit that the political system in UK should facilitate demonstrations of discontent and such demonstrations should be regarded as an integral part of UK’s democratic system. I submit that protest is a part of any democratic society. It’s a shame and probably to their detriment that governments ignore protests.