On a quiet day, I can hear her

Not only is another world possible, she is on her way. On a quiet day, I can hear her breathing.
– Arundhati Roy

I can hear her
deep

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

David Cameron Islamic Extremism speech July 2015

I’ll be making some remarks on David Cameron’s recent speech on so-called Islamic Extremism. Later on in his speech Cameron says that he wants to do away with this blog under his ‘Extremism Bill’. edit: He doesn’t actually say this blog but

“First, any strategy to defeat extremism must confront, head on, the extreme ideology that underpins it. We must take its component parts to pieces – the cultish worldview, the conspiracy theories

we should together challenge the ludicrous conspiracy theories of the extremists. The world is not conspiring against Islam; the security services aren’t behind terrorist attacks

Second, as we counter this ideology, a key part of our strategy must be to tackle both parts of the creed – the non-violent and violent.

This means confronting groups and organisations that may not advocate violence – but which do promote other parts of the extremist narrative.

We must demand that people also condemn the wild conspiracy theories, the anti-Semitism, and the sectarianism too. Being tough on this is entirely keeping with our values.

We need to put out of action the key extremist influencers who are careful to operate just inside the law, but who clearly detest British society and everything we stand for [Tory values]. These people aren’t just extremists. There are despicable far right groups too. And what links them all is their aim to groom young people and brainwash their minds.

So as part of our Extremism Bill, we are going to introduce new narrowly targeted powers to enable us to deal with these facilitators and cult leaders, and stop them peddling their hatred.

As I said, this is not about clamping down on free speech. It’s just about applying our shared values uniformly.

This blog peddles conspiracy theories and claims that security services are behind terrorist attacks.

Sorry Cameron, you’ll be imprisoning me.

image of David Cameron, Rupert Murdoch and Rebekah Brooks

David Cameron, Rupert Murdoch and Rebekah Brooks

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/david-cameron-extremism-speech-read-the-transcript-in-full-10401948.html

It’s great to be here at this outstanding school, Ninestiles School. Your inspiring teachers and your commitment to British values means you are not just achieving outstanding academic success, but you are building a shared community where children of many faiths and backgrounds learn not just with each other, but from each other too.

Politicians giving speeches at schools is out of order. While they’re guaranteed an audience it’s insulting and disrespectful to the school-students involved. There is an authoritarian regime in schools where students are ordered about and they follow those orders. Their human rights are not recognised. The students didn’t realise they could turn around and say “Fuck off! I’m not listening to that asshole” because of course they can’t. It’s lucky no politician tried that while I was at school.

Blair used to do it a lot – probably because he’d never get an audience towards the end of his reign. He’d go to a school and avoid any eye contact with the students – that’s one of the things that put me onto him and his evil ways. Why was he avoiding eye contact?

Blair went to one school and was booed by the students. He was so deranged and divorced from reality that his aides persuaded him that they were doing some youth-speak “Boom” showing respect for him. Twat.

And that goes right to the heart of what I want to talk about today.

I said on the steps of Downing Street that this would be a ‘one nation’ government, bringing our country together.

That’s total bullshit then. It’s four or five nations for a start. What about the Evel measures Cameron was pursuing? That’s certainly very divisive.

Today, I want to talk about a vital element of that. How together we defeat extremism and at the same time build a stronger, more cohesive society.

My starting point is this.

Over generations, we have built something extraordinary in Britain – a successful multi-racial, multi-faith democracy. It’s open, diverse, welcoming – these characteristics are as British as queuing and talking about the weather.

It’s not welcoming, is it?

It is here in Britain where different people, from different backgrounds, who follow different religions and different customs don’t just rub alongside each other but are relatives and friends; husbands, wives, cousins, neighbours and colleagues.

It is here in Britain where in one or two generations people can come with nothing and rise as high as their talent allows.

It is here in Britain where success is achieved not in spite of our diversity, but because of our diversity.

I’m letting that pass because it’s trivial.

So as we talk about the threat of extremism and the challenge of integration, we should not do our country down – we are, without a shadow of doubt, a beacon to the world.

Oh come on.

And as we debate these issues, neither should we demonise people of particular backgrounds. Every one of the communities that has come to call our country home has made Britain a better place. And because the focus of my remarks today is on tackling Islamist extremism – not Islam the religion – let me say this.

Hmm, Muslims are the one religion that is seriously discriminated against. I happened across a couple of Muslim school students who were about fourteen the other day. I was cycling through a park and they had to move out of the way for me to pass through the gate to leave the park. We exchanged a few words. They were ashamed. I regret not making an issue of telling them that they had nothing to be ashamed of. This is what it’s all about – it’s young Muslims who will be [ed: relentlessly] bullied by school authorities – they’re not ever going to have a break, are they? That seems to me very much like a way to create extremism rather than defeat it.

26/7/15 I’m going to jump ahead because it’s crap.

I was thinking about whether these “our values” actually exist and who is Cameron to define these “our values”. I was intending to argue that there is no consensus since we are so diverse as Cameron has already said and that I share very few values with Cameron. Values are different from beliefs and I should think that values probably follow from beliefs. It follows that since peoples’ beliefs are different then they have different values. I think that’s about right. What about you?

Take for example a religion that promotes the idea that all other religions are inferior – that all others not following that particular religion are animals or beasts in human form, sub-human. Now if you had accepted such beliefs, wouldn’t values follow? and wouldn’t behaviour follow from those values?

So, my proposition is that there are no such “our values”.

26/7/15 19.30 BST

What are these “our values”?

But you don’t have to support violence to subscribe to certain intolerant ideas which create a climate in which extremists can flourish.

Ideas which are hostile to basic liberal values such as democracy, freedom and sexual equality.

Surely Cameron must mean pretend-democracy, pretend-freedom and not even pretend sexual equality. Cameron, former PM Tony Blair and former Resident Dubya Bush are Neo-Conservatives. Neo-Conservatives follow the anti-democratic and illiberal philosophy of Leo Strauss that it is necessary to deceive to rule. It would seem that Cameron is proposing that “our values” includes support for an obvious sham-democracy that is maintained through dissembling and deception.

Ideas which actively promote discrimination, sectarianism and segregation.

Like Cameron’s proposed Extremism Bill.

Ideas – like those of the despicable far right – which privilege one identity to the detriment of the rights and freedoms of others.

Like the religion I mentioned earlier and this speech and the proposed Extremism Bill and Neo-Conservatives.

TBC

Danger Mice

Cameron fights for his brutish values – more Islamophobia and war

Posted in David Cameron, human rights, neo-con, new authoritarianism, politics, terrorism bullshit, Tony Blair | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Yesterday …

image of lock mushroom pins

I managed to open a high-security padlock with the wrong key. I didn’t realise that I was using the wrong key and was willing it open. Granted it’s a cheap-end high-security padlock but it has certainly got anti-pick features like mushroom pins.

I couldn’t repeat it once I realised that it was the wrong key.

MIT guide to lock-picking

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

I hate these Tory scum

Gan we get rid of them?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Cameron & his Tory shits attack the disabled

I apologise that I’m still trying to get up to speed on this. ILF. Is it The Independent Living Fund that has been abolished?

I’m sorry. I know that this **** ********* (Tory Government – well you can make up your own) has abolished the support that allows disabled people to have a life.

ed: Cameron and Osborne have abolished the support that disabled people need to live independently.

ed: What it means is that they will be denied their independence and will be institutionalised and much more actually. It will mean that disabled people are imprisoned.

ed: It’s happening. Independent Living Fund has been abolished. Disabled people are being institutionalised i.e. imprisoned.

Imprisoned for being disabled?

I want to say that Hitler went for the disabled first but did he? I’m going to say it regardless. There were homos, communist and socialists too. Am I missing something? Well that’s history for you.

08:10ed: Ok I lost the plot there. The point is that the independent living benefit for disabled people has been abolished. What this means for disabled people is that they are institutionalised i.e. imprisoned for being disabled. That’s thanks to Cameron and Osborne who are ever so willing to provide huge benefits for crap bankers.

 

Posted in David Cameron, George Osborne, neo-con, new authoritarianism, politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

What does it take to get people in Revolutionary mode?

tbc …

not that I’m even suggesting that of course

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

We’ve got to stand up these Tory scum and say No

We’ve got to stand up united and say

We’ve had enough of your Tory shit

We’ve had enough of your support for rich bankers and tax evaders

We’ve had enough of your attacks on the poor

We’ve had enough of your attacks on the disabled

We’ve had enough of you

not to mention your made up terrorism bullshit and persecution of innocent people

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Marking

Mr. Cameron,

I found your essay on the threat of Islamic Extremism in the UK inadequate and deficient. I consider your analysis partisan, prejudged and restricted. Your proposal to harass and vilify young people of a certain religion I find reprehensible.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A decade on …

A decade on I’m starting to feel very much like I did a decade ago – that the state is out to get me personally. Actually, it’s more than just a feeling. It’s the language used about Fascists (individual Fascists?) and Big Cons.

It all seems totally out of proportion as it was a decade ago. Hardly necessary or proportionate for name-calling a couple of Bully-boys and making a probably unfulfilled commitment to get up to speed. I said that I was trying to move on. The trouble is that it should by now be well appreciated that I do defend myself.

I can’t help thinking that perhaps this post would be better made tomorrow.

11.30 edit: I’m going to let this go for a short time to see if there’s confirmation or not.

20.35 edit: Having reviewed things I think that I was prob mistaken and that it’s not directed at myself. It’s taken me a long time to get a handle on Cameron and I think that it’s simply that he’s a big fan of Tonee’s for unknown reasons and – despite achieving good grades – he’s not that bright. For example the (Eton) mess that he made about censoring search engines and now he wants to ban alternative narratives (conspiracy theories) and start a Cameron Youth.

2332596

Posted in 2005, 7/7, David Cameron, fake manufactured terrorism, neo-con, new authoritarianism, politics, previous blog, terrorism bullshit, Tony Blair, unofficial narrative | Tagged | Leave a comment

David Cameron to joke about Islamic extremism

image of David Cameron, Rupert Murdoch and Rebekah Brooks

David Cameron, Rupert Murdoch and Rebekah Brooks

This got me going:

David Cameron launches 5 year-plan to tackle Islamic extremism in Britain

Mr Cameron will argue that such a “warped world view” leads to conclusions that 9/11 was “actually inspired by Mossad to provoke the invasion of Afghanistan” and that the British security services knew about 7/7, but “didn’t do anything about it because they wanted to provoke an anti-Muslim backlash”.

and Louise Casey is still about.

Posted in David Cameron, new authoritarianism, politics, they made it up | Leave a comment

VIP paedos

Australia’s 60 Minutes does a special on Britain’s VIP paedophiles.

!I wonder who that prominent politician mentioned is …

Video: Kincora was used for ‘political leverage’ – Richard Kerr

More relevent articles at the exaronews site.

Posted in paedo, politics, Thatcher's paedos, Tony Blair | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Boris Johnson’s crap water cannons

Boris Johnson’s water cannon farce reveals why he will never be prime minister by Adam Bienkov

“…

The inspectors found the weapons have as little as two years’ operational life left before they have to be turned into scrap. Recurrent problems with the pump and the “critical failure” of the tank would be hugely costly to repair and there could be significant problems finding spare parts for vehicles that are now at the end of their operational life. Day-to-day operation and maintenance of the weapons would also be complicated by the lack of any manuals available in English. Meanwhile the time needed to make essential repairs could leave the weapons out of service for significant periods of time.

Bullingdon Tory idiot Boris Johnson

In short, the Home Office found the weapons to be seriously dangerous, hugely difficult and expensive to maintain and operate, and shortly in need of a trip to the scrap yard.

Given the majority of these problems were public knowledge in Germany before Johnson agreed to buy the weapons, it is incredible that he still went ahead anyway. It is especially baffling given that he was repeatedly warned against buying the weapons, not just by his opponents, but by his own former policing deputy and his own party on the London Assembly. Last year, when Johnson pushed ahead with their purchase anyway, a senior member of his City Hall team told me that Boris would “live to regret” his decision. How right they were.

In fact, Johnson’s more sensible advisers aside, the only people to have come out of this sorry saga well are the negotiators of the German police force. The ingenuity and financial sense of the Germans has been somewhat called into question in recent weeks. However, they can hardly be faulted for their prudent management of this particular deal. It is difficult at the best of times to dispose of obsolete and life-threatening military hardware. But for the Germans to get a foreign politician to actually pay 300,000 euros for the privilege of disposing of the defunct weapons for them was a particularly impressive feat.

…”

Posted in Boris Johnson, politics, Theresa May | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Looks like we’ve got to go for truthyism – bankers are responsible, bankers have done really well. UK Tories Cameron and Osborne’s policies of quantitative easing Doesn’t that mean that bankers are crap but they get loadsa money anyway? Looks like whatever you do if you’re upper class you’ll be rich at the expense of the poor

Quantitative easing?

I’m sorry, please correct me here, doesn’t that mean that Capitalism is crap?

This idea of Capitalism … You have to have QE. Isn’t it disproved?

Doesn’t that mean that Capitalism is a failed theory?

Hasn’t it failed?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Craig Murray on how the Left can win

Craig Murray has an excellent article on how the Left can win.

“A Daily Mirror opinion poll following a BBC televised Labour leadership candidates’ debate this week had Jeremy Corbyn as the clear winner, with twice the support of anyone else. The media ridicule level has picked up since. This policy of marginalisation works. I was saddened by readers’ comments under a Guardian report of that debate, in which Labour supporter after Labour supporter posted comment to the effect “I would like to vote for Jeremy Corbyn because he believes in the same things I do, but we need a more right wing leader to have a chance of winning.”

There are two answers to that. The first is no, you don’t need to be right wing to win. Look at the SNP. The second is what the bloody hell are you in politics for anyway? Do you just want your team to win like it was football? Is there any point at all in being elected just so you can carry out the same policies as your opponents? The problem is, of course, that for so many in the Labour Party, especially but not just the MPs, they want to win for personal career advantage not actually to promote particular policies.”

 

Posted in anti-austerity, austerity, Jeremy Corbyn, Labour Party, politics, Socialism, Socialist | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Do you want a political or a garden party?

Cucumber sandwich?

Oh, yes thank you ever so much I’ll continue to pretend to represent the poor as long as I have all these benefits.

More expenses?

Oh, yes thank you ever so much I’ll continue to pretend to represent the poor as long as I have all these benefits.

Oh, yes thank you ever so much I’ll continue to pretend to represent the poor as long as I have all these benefits.

Oh, yes thank you ever so much I’ll continue to pretend to represent the poor as long as I have all these benefits.

Oh, yes thank you ever so much I’ll continue to pretend to represent the poor as long as I have all these benefits.

Oh, yes thank you ever so much I’ll continue to pretend to represent the poor as long as I have all these benefits.

Oh, yes thank you ever so much I’ll continue to pretend to represent the poor as long as I have all these benefits.

Oh, yes thank you ever so much I’ll continue to pretend to represent the poor as long as I have all these benefits.

Posted in benefits, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Jeremy Corbyn, Socialist

23.17 edit: If I had a vote, Jeremy Corbyn would most certainly – without any doubt – have it.

00.57 I’m calling on Lefties to support Jeremy Corbyn.

Posted in anti-austerity, austerity, human rights, Jeremy Corbyn, Labour Party, politics, Socialism, Socialist | Tagged | Leave a comment

Is nice …

A decade ago, I’m letting it go.

It was totally ridiculous nonsese.

It will all come out in the dirty washing …

I am not interested in convincing or converting people – that’s ridiculous especially since so many people are so averse to reality and rational argument. Why bother?

ed: It’s not really why bother. It’s more that it’s why? These people (cor luddy heel, that’s a Blair phrase), what’s the point? They’re going to believe what television tells them and that’s it. They are simply going to believe television. That’s it.

I have satisfied myself to the truth and now i would like to get on with enjoying my life.

ed: Take note: I am still a political activist and oppose the Bully-boys.

ed: Going to Bristol Pride.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

I am a Political Activist, I am a Political Dissident

I did oppose Blair. I oppose Cameron and Osborne.

I am not a terrrist because in a democratic society political activism is not only tolerated but regarded as participation in the democratic process.

ed: Is better, TY :) Oh Dear, did anyone notice that? Of course he did, don’t be ridiculous.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Terrrist suspect here. Suspected Terrorist here (Political Activist)

Please appreciate that I have been …

I drove a mini car – a British Leyland mini 1000

what a lovely car.

(I’m carrying on

So what’s happening of course is

Hey, do you think that perhaps you ought to wake up?

Do you think that perhaps you should engage …

No?

Engage brain? I’m going to have to give up on it.

It’s very disappointing that there are not many people that think for themselves.

later: Stick it UYA

It’s because I was a political activist. It’s because I attended political demonstarations

It’s because I went on protests.

It’s because I WAS a political activist.

The trouble is that,

people should be politically active

that’s what democracy is all about

Democracy is about people deciding

who represents them

The police pretended they were looking for a mini 1000

BULUX

This terrorism nonsense is done by governments. It used to be be afraid of the Soviet Union. It’s BS.

In the end, This TS BS, you’ve gotta sat SIYA

So this is how it works. Legitimate political activists in UK are …

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Blair used the military

Blair used military helicopters on civilians.

He did

He used military helicopters in Bristol

He did

HE USED MILITARY HELICOPTERS TO SPY ON ME

HE DID

use your search engines

This would be about 2005, Plummers Hill

Plummer’s Hil is good, the year about

NEW POST

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment